My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
04-12-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 9:20:11 AM
Creation date
4/15/2021 9:09:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, March 15, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />already there and he does not believe that will be an issue. Mr. Newell is a landscape architect so the first <br />thing he did when he bought the property was to machine-move trees, so they already have a regimented <br />landscaping appearance to it which he hopes will conform. He knows that will have to be determined once <br />they have that plan in place. <br /> <br />Bollis asked regarding lot width for Lot 2, was that a question? <br /> <br />Barnhart replied the comment was that Staff just wanted confirmation that it was over 200 feet; his math <br />shows that it is over 200 feet and he just wants confirmation from the surveying company in the final <br />drawing. <br /> <br />Bollis assumes the easement for the Watershed District is through Lot 1 at the end of the cul -de-sac. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied yes. <br /> <br />Bollis asked if that will eat into any of the dry buildable on Lot 1. <br /> <br />Mr. Newell replied it shouldn’t; there is already an existing easement or entrance there that he planted off <br />as much as he can leaving about a 45-foot path to be able to still get access in, which should allow just <br />about any kind of dredging. He believes that is the reason they want to be able to get back in and clean that <br />pond should it silt-out. Mr. Newell noted they just examined it last year and when he spoke with Heidi there <br />were no plans to do any type of work, except there is one thing up by the dam that they are proposing. <br /> <br />Bollis asked to clarify that it is not an access easement, but more of an easement to do work within that <br />wetland. <br /> <br />Mr. Newell replied that is correct…it is so they can get into that pond. <br /> <br />Barnhart said to be clear, he does not know what the full intent is for that property or easement and that is <br />why they are deferring to their comment. <br /> <br />Mr. Newell stated their intent, once they clear the mortgage, is to actually donate all the wetlands. So, the <br />property that is directly below Lot 3, those wetlands and the pond would be donated to the Watershed <br />District. <br /> <br />Gettman asked to go to the second to last page of the packet showing the lots that border the lake. <br /> <br />Mr. Newell noted they do not border a lake. <br /> <br />Gettman understands that. He noted on screen the area below the blue line and asked if those are three <br />separate, oversized lots that have houses on them; how will they be affected by the wetlands area. <br /> <br />Barnhart does not understand the question. <br /> <br />Gettman noted it is for the Applicant and he is trying to make sure he understands what Mr. Newell is <br />talking about regarding the wetlands; is the area that has the house right now below that or south of that or <br />is it the area west of it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.