Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#LA21-000017 <br /> 15 March 2021 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> 4110 6. Public use limited. "Any permit issued under this section shall be deemed to open the <br /> platted public right-of-way only to the extent necessary as established in the permit, and <br /> for the limited use of the permittee and his invitees." <br /> 7. Permit limitations. "A permit issued under this section shall not grant or vest any property <br /> rights to use of the public right-of-way or other public property, or in any improvements. <br /> Permits issued under this section shall be valid for one year, shall be subject to change, <br /> alteration or revocation for cause by the council at any time, and shall be automatically <br /> renewable on the anniversary of the date of issuance except upon written notice from the <br /> city to the permittee at least 30 days prior to the anniversary date." <br /> 8. Hold harmless..."As a condition of issuance of any permit, the applicant shall in writing <br /> release, indemnify and hold harmless the city from any and all claims or causes of action <br /> arising out of the use or alteration of the platted right-of-way by applicant or his invitees." <br /> 9. Permit hearing and notice. "The planning commission or the council shall hold a public <br /> hearing or hearings on each application for a permit..." <br /> Discussion: <br /> Staff finds the request generally meets the criteria outlined in Section 78-567 for approval. In 2019, <br /> a request for a dock on right-of-way was made on the western portion of Big Island(#LA19-000086). <br /> That property owner, Ms. Fieger, had been utilizing an informal easement over a neighboring, <br /> lakeshore property. The City Council upon review of the details, directed staff to explore a text <br /> amendment to the Subdivision Regulations (Chapter 82) to facilitate the creation of a legal lake <br /> access easement only in the RS District;this was added to the Code in 2020 (included in Exhibit D). <br /> S The text amendment resolved the access issue for Ms. Fieger and her permit request was <br /> withdrawn. Knowing this provision was now available to them, the applicants have attempted <br /> unsuccessfully to secure a private easements from neighbors (including Three Rivers Park District) <br /> as detailed in their submittal.They decided,with the boating season fast approaching,to begin the <br /> City permitting process. Their submittal included their reasoning for selecting this site. <br /> As a result of the applicants' request and based on the resolution language,at this time Permit 2038 <br /> should be considered to be revoked; Staff has confirmed that the holder of Permit 2038 continues <br /> to desire dock access.While formally revoked, if the Commission/Council feel a dock is appropriate, <br /> staff suggests that some compromise or coordination occur to maintain access for both parties. <br /> With the exception of the Permit 2038 for 230 Big Island and its automatic revocation condition, <br /> the applicants' dock request should not unreasonably impact the other properties on this side of <br /> the island. There are two additional interior lots on the east side of the island (490 and 500 Big <br /> Island)without lake access who may, in the future, request a permit for a dock on right-of-way.The <br /> City should anticipate requests from 490 and 500 Big Island at some time. The other remaining <br /> properties on the east side are either lakeshore properties or in common ownership with a <br /> lakeshore property, thus providing the opportunity for a dock. Staff recommends the dock access <br /> question for inland lots be looked at comprehensively. <br /> Public Comments <br /> A public hearing notice was sent out to the property owners within 500-feet of the applicants' <br /> property notifying about the Planning Commission public hearing. In order to ensure transparency <br /> and to solicit additional comments for City Council use,staff has developed a second notice will be <br /> sent on March 31st to the owners within 500 feet of the proposed dock site. A number of public <br /> comments have been received and they are attached as Exhibit I. Most comments oppose the dock. <br />