Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit L <br /> UPDATED <br /> REQUEST <br /> Dear Ms. Curtis, <br /> I am writing to submit additional information and clarity based on <br /> further discovery of the existing permits and submitted feedback <br /> and concerns from property owners directly impacted by my <br /> application. <br /> As stated on the first page of my background and context that I <br /> submitted with my application. I am hopeful that an amicable and <br /> a neighborly solution can be found and still allows me access to <br /> my property. <br /> I have gained additional historical context on the rarely requested <br /> dock permits on this part of the island (I believe two in the last <br /> 38+ years). <br /> My request and application follow's similar precedent to the other <br /> interior property lot holders who have also requested access to <br /> their property and which has been approved. <br /> I would like to add some clarifying points and also pose a <br /> potential scenario for the council to consider that balances some <br /> of the concerns of the most affected parties. <br /> As I reviewed feedback submitted by Ms. Farnes and Mr. Bruntjen <br /> at 230 Big Island with an existing permit, one of the unusual <br /> aspect is the following language within the permit. It states; <br /> "Should there be any other another request from an inland property owner <br /> to use this site for the installation of a dock to their properties this permit is <br /> automatically revoked." <br />