My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2021 9:07:35 AM
Creation date
3/16/2021 9:06:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 16, 2021 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Personally, Bollis is fine moving this to Council as a sketch plan with the feedback. <br />Ressler is not opposed to that. <br />Erickson would be comfortable moving it on to the City Council. <br />13. UPDATE ON FEBRUARY 8, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Barnhart shared applications the Planning Commission reviewed in January were all reviewed by the City <br />Council on February 8. The preliminary plat at 1700 Shoreline (recommended approval 6-1), the Council <br />directed Staff to draft a resolution of approval with a vote of 4-0. Roof coverage variance at 3145 North <br />Shore Drive (PC recommended approval) and the City Council approved that on consent 4-0. CUP for <br />plumbing at 3425 Thoroughbred was approved. The variance for Average Lakeshore Setback at 2967 <br />Casco was recommended to deny by Staff, Planning Commission recommended approval, and the City <br />Council approved it 4-0. Text amendment related to appeals was approved and the text amendment <br />related to the dry buildable definition was approved by the City Council. <br />Ressler asked if the City Council approved the proposed plat for the Jacobs Estate. <br />Barnhart said the City Council directed Staff to draft a resolution for approval and they have not <br />technically approved it yet. The main issue the City Council had was the turn lane requirement and <br />requested some additional feedback from the County in terms of what is required and he received that <br />earlier today. He thinks that question has been answered and there will not be any impact to the <br />neighbor's property. <br />Bollis asked if the County requires a turn lane. <br />Barnhart replied yes for westbound traffic. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />Kirchner moved, Erickson seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting. VOTE: Ayes <br />6, Nays 0. <br />The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 10:02 p.m. <br />ATTEST: <br />Page 38 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.