Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 16, 2021 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Barnhart does not think this site is big enough to support a higher density than that. To do an apartment <br />building it would likely require use of the City outlot A, and whether it was intentional or not, the City <br />Council did not want to include development of the City lot for that. He said it is still guided for that, but <br />not guided for high density. <br />McCutcheon does not know if the community garden has a high utility but if it does, he can see the City <br />Council's reluctance to put high density there. <br />Bill Stoddard, 440 3`d Street, Excelsior, approached the podium. He appreciates the Planning <br />Commission's time in giving feedback on this application and noted it is a very unique site; he is a <br />smaller developer than some of the other parties seen today and he has done things such as a 172 -unit <br />apartment building, assisted living facilities, and in downtown Excelsior the 10 -brick row -houses, and the <br />18 twin villas. He has heard some historic comments and has lived in Orono for 20 years and is still in the <br />same zip code in Excelsior, he was on the Planning Commission for 7 years in the 1990's. Barnhart told <br />him he could remind the Planning Commission of the times in the past, but not keep them here until, 1:00 <br />a.m. like they did with Spring Hill. He noted this is a very funky site and he has it under purchase <br />agreement, he has talked to a number of builders, some said no way, it's right on the highway, guided for <br />residential. He said Barnhart laid out some of the comments and feedback and Mr. Stoddard noted it is <br />right on the highway and looks at boat storage. To make the site even have a chance of working, they <br />first proposed having the access right off of Willow Drive, and that was massaged and changed with City <br />Staff. That doubles the length of road they have to put in, and still may probably be a deal breaker for the <br />Planning Commission. Another comment is having a cul-de-sac and two 90 -foot cul-de-sacs at each end <br />of the property line, which are designed so fire trucks can turn around. He said this is right on the fire <br />station property and they have worked with fire departments in the past to see where they can place fire <br />hydrants; this project cannot support three 90 -foot cul-de-sacs. Mr. Stoddard was told when the fire <br />station went in there, their storm water was designed for the size of their building. However, he would <br />ask the City to allow them to engage that ownership to see if they can enlarge that storm water and pipe <br />some of it to that site. That would leave some drier land for him to have some recreational land. He <br />requested some green light/red light about talking to neighboring properties about increasing that. <br />Bollis looks at this and prefers the access to be off of Willow Drive; he recognizes it is close to the <br />overpass but he would be favorable of a variance for a side yard setback for that road so it could be closer <br />to the fire station and farther from the overpass. That way they don't have to use the really nice vacant <br />City lot for access of this private development. In fact, that vacant lot looks like it might be a good place <br />for a municipal building instead of across the highway on Old Crystal Bay Road. He believes the access <br />should be within its own site and they have less storm water to worry about. The cul-de-sac issue, the <br />City has required cul-de-sacs for two private homes on 10 acres, so it is hard to say they would not <br />require a full cul-de-sac for this. Regarding storm water, Bollis feels it should be on site, especially if the <br />road can be on site. He feels like extending fire station road through kind of ruins this lot where the <br />community garden is for any potential future use the City may need it for. <br />Ressler asked Barnhart if they have any feedback from the City Council as far as what the eventual use of <br />that City lot will be. <br />Barnhart said it is the Community Garden and he thinks if they asked the City Council today, they would <br />say the future use of that property is a Community Garden; he does not think there are plans or support to <br />change that. <br />Page 33 of 38 <br />