My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2021 9:07:35 AM
Creation date
3/16/2021 9:06:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 16, 2021 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />open space internally. From the marketing aspect, he is not sure which one will sell and how the market <br />will receive it, but it is something to think about. <br />Barnhart commented that the Planning Commission and City Council made it very clear they want to see <br />setbacks of a certain dimension during the sketch plan review. His proposal "ignores" that <br />recommendation because it does require waivers against what they had discussed earlier; he thinks the <br />tradeoff is beneficial to the City in the long-term, but it is completely up the Planning Commission if they <br />want to support those types of waivers. <br />Kirchner said one of the feedback questions was specific to the orientation and he would agree with <br />Libby, not so much for the service vehicles, but for the exact reason the Applicant has just mentioned. He <br />has the floor plans up and a walk-up unit that feeds directly into an outlot with a family room that would <br />be next to those walk-up unit doors. They spoke earlier about a family in a backyard and he sees that as a <br />way for this community to do that; one could be in the family room and have kids out in the greenspace. <br />He has concerns if they were to put Road A across and flip the orientation, he feels they lose greenspace <br />in the center which he believes is important to Orono residents and is something they value. He also then <br />sees children walking across the street to get to the park where right now they can walk out a door and are <br />on a sidewalk. He actually prefers this design and thinks Wayzata Boulevard is a major thoroughfare <br />with a speed limit of 50 mph, there are gas stations, a McDonald's, and he does not know that people will <br />care too much that they are looking at garage doors when driving by. He does not know about Willow, <br />but again said he appreciates this design and thinks it creates a bit of a community within this <br />development. <br />If Erickson imagines himself as a potential buyer for one of these, he would prefer the one on the screen <br />over this one. The reasoning is by having the garages facing Willow Drive and Wayzata Boulevard, it <br />creates a better community feeling in the interior. The "backyard" is a relatively private recreational area <br />which gives a backyard feeling in sharing with the neighbors. With the high traffic on Wayzata and <br />Willow, that is where the garage is; to him it would be much more inviting and that would be a much <br />easier sell. He also wants to commend the Applicant for making a tremendous improvement over what <br />they were looking at last year, which was not terribly bad, but was not as good as this. He recalls in the <br />Planning Commission meeting garages backing up to each other and if someone backs up and there is a <br />car there it could be a conflict; that has all been eliminated by this loop road which is a wonderful <br />improvement. Another comment made, originally the recreational area was over on Kelley and again, in <br />creating a community with an element of privacy but still shared with neighbors, these are all <br />improvements and he really likes it. <br />Bollis agrees with Staff about the orientation, as aesthetically he thinks it would look more pleasing <br />driving along Highway 12 or on Willow in looking at fronts of units similar to Stone Bay. Most of those <br />units along Kelley are looking at the front of the unit or the "pretty" face of the house. As a resident of <br />the community, he thinks it would look better, but he tends to agree with the Applicant that the flow and <br />engineering -wise isn't quite there if they flip them. <br />Mr. Saddiqui did complement that by having the fronts on Kelley to Stone Bay. <br />Bollis said in looking at the two plans, he would prefer the one on screen if he were going to be living <br />there. If he was not living there, he would prefer the aesthetics of the secondary plan. He said it is just a <br />comment and he does not know how he feels one way or the other for a vote on that. He asked if the <br />Page 27 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.