Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 16, 2021 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Catelyn Nelson noted if they were to put it on the side, it eliminates the safety factor of having the whole <br />family in the backyard. One of their daughters cannot be in the sun, so to give her an equal shot at being <br />a kid is something they are really focused on. <br />Libby asked for an idea of the elevation of the screen porch. <br />Mr. Nelson said the backyard goes way up and showed on screen that it goes way up; from the golf <br />course's perspective they will be below that and those on the golf path will not really be able to see it. He <br />noted there is also about 70 feet of woods behind them, and there is also a berm and a hill that protects it <br />from the neighbor on one side; on the other side of the house, they cannot even see that neighbor's house. <br />He stated it is private and he believes that is also why the neighbors are in such high support of this. <br />Libby asked if there are any future plans to have egress from the screen porch to the exterior of the yard. <br />Mr. Nelson asked what he means by egress. <br />Libby said an access to get in and out of the screen porch into the backyard. <br />Mr. Nelson replied it would be right where the door is shown on screen, and he thinks that would still be <br />inside of the variance. <br />Libby is hearing loud and clear about safety as he is a great-grandfather. <br />Ressler said while they are on that slide, he sees a proposed stoop. <br />Oakden believes those are the existing doors from the house to the back yard. <br />Mr. Nelson said that will actually be removed. <br />Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. <br />Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. <br />Ressler said in lieu of the public hearing they always have the letters of support on the application. <br />McCutcheon thinks that breaks a record as there are a lot of them. <br />Kirchner said these seven letters of support are the most he has seen on an application. <br />McCutcheon thinks the Applicant laid it out pretty well; the 30 -foot setback is meant for 2 acre lots, so <br />being an acre lot, in his eyes is it a practical difficulty and the Planning Commission has ruled on that in <br />the past. With the boulders, the steepness, and moving the porch to the middle, that would cut their yard <br />in half. He said it is a bigger proposed screen porch but as the Applicant laid out with their child it is <br />necessary for them. McCutcheon remembers when the golf course built a garage and they wanted to go <br />closer to the residence setback and the Planning Commission allowed that. If they can go towards the <br />neighborhoods, he does not have a problem with the neighborhoods going towards the golf course. He is <br />in support of it. <br />Page 14 of 38 <br />