Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 8,2021 <br /> 6:03 p.m. <br /> 19. LA20-000048-TIMOTHY WHITTEN OB/O I.JACOBS/A.JACOBS REVOCABLE <br /> TRUST, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE,PRELIMINARY PLAT-RESOLUTION—Continued <br /> Walsh thinks the question Johnson was asking at the Planning Commission,the Burwell's brought up that <br /> in constructing the turn lane they were under the impression that their private property would be used to <br /> do that turn lane. He thought someone at the time said they would not have to be on or take any of the <br /> Burwell's private property to make that happen. <br /> Johnson clarified it was not the turn lane but he thought there was some concern that the activity of doing <br /> this development and putting in this shared driveway where it exists as a singular driveway now was <br /> going to impact some of the trees on their property. <br /> Mr.Whitten stated he is not aware that it will impact but he will let Mr. Gronberg reply to that. They are <br /> putting the road basically in the same position that the existing road is but it will be a little bit wider. <br /> Johnson noted the Planning Commission was also asked to get a dock plan and asked if the Applicant has <br /> gotten that far. <br /> Mr.Whitten said they have not gone through that exercise yet. <br /> Johnson said the Applicant got rid of Outlot D which he thinks is a good idea based on the feedback from <br /> the Planning Commission and asked if they will likely do a joint dock down there. <br /> Mr. Whitten thinks that is a possibility and it will likely be up to the property owners to decide whether <br /> they would have a joint dock. <br /> Barnhart clarified the Code does allow joint-use dock facilities but that is done at the time of the <br /> subdivision so that decision would have to be made as part of the final plan at the latest stage. <br /> Walsh assumes the owners of the property would have to agree to do that. <br /> Barnhart said yes. <br /> Walsh stated they could have three individual dock formations and they would all have to get along to do <br /> a shared dock. <br /> Johnson said it is either that or risk your life heading to your dock on Lot 3. He understands the <br /> Applicant will clear trees over 4 inches along the lakeshore but that does not necessarily make it safer. <br /> He thinks the Planning Commission hit on it—the turn lane is relevant and Johnson does not know what <br /> jurisdiction the City has in dictating that or not. However,there is no safe way to cross this as it is a busy <br /> road;he noted he lives just down the street and goes by there all the time. For the value of the <br /> development,the Applicant wants to mitigate that as much as possible and Johnson thinks that all the <br /> crossings that occur here are at an increased amount of risk as it is a busy road.Whatever they can do to <br /> keep people from continuing down this road even farther is something to be looked at whether that is a <br /> sidewalk or whatever that is. <br /> Walsh asked if Johnson would suggest that he would want a joint dock put in to solve some of that. <br /> Page 8 of 26 <br />