My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-2021 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
02-08-2021 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2021 8:30:15 AM
Creation date
2/24/2021 8:30:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 8,2021 <br /> 6:03 p.m. <br /> 19. LA20-000048-TIMOTHY WHITTEN O/B/O I.JACOBS/A.JACOBS REVOCABLE <br /> TRUST, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE,PRELIMINARY PLAT-RESOLUTION—Continued <br /> Barnhart asked if he is referring to Lot 5. <br /> Johnson replied for the entire property. For example, it is a completely blank lot and someone wants to <br /> put a single family home on this property. Where would the City's setback be from the Tanager side. <br /> Barnhart clarified this is a vacant lot at 1700 Shoreline,the 20 acre parcel noted on-screen in blue. As a <br /> setback from Tanager,three things will come into play: the 75 foot lake lot setback, some bluffs and other <br /> things within the lot that will provide additional setback. Barnhart said this is his estimation of what the <br /> ALS is:the neighboring lake lot to the west is Lot 3 of Tanager estates and that is not improved so that is <br /> a vacant lot. Therefore the average lakeshore setback for this lot is based on the distance between the <br /> improved lot to the east which is 1100 Millston and that is the 398 foot setback. He said that is roughly <br /> what the red line on-screen is. Barnhart stated it is not perfect and he looks for engineers and surveyors to <br /> give a better number,but based on his measurement tool that is what he was able to estimate. <br /> Johnson said under the City's code they would not be drawing a line between the property to the east and <br /> the property that does exist to the west. They would be using a distance from Tanager,from the ordinary <br /> high water mark based on the property to the east only. <br /> Barnhart replied yes. <br /> Walsh stated it is because there is no other house on the other lot yet. Once there is a home,they will <br /> have the measurement between the two if it is there before anything gets built. <br /> Johnson noted the one that exists to the east is not relevant. <br /> Crosby said the one to the east is relevant. <br /> Johnson apologized and clarified to the west. They have the one to the east but there is a property to the <br /> west existing. <br /> Barnhart replied yes,but it is a lot over. The City only looks at the neighboring lots;the lot to the west is <br /> currently vacant,which is Lot 3 of Tanager Estates. When the house is built,they will then draw that line <br /> between the two. <br /> Johnson asked if they come around the corner on the west side of the property, is that a different lot right <br /> there. <br /> Barnhart stated that is a different lot,yes. <br /> Johnson said that is a different lot but they are not considering that lot. <br /> Barnhart said that is a lake lot only on Smith Bay and it is not a lake lot on Tanager Lake. That is where <br /> the line comes in. To his estimation it is the closest point to this house to Smith Bay and the closest point <br /> of the neighboring lot to the east and that is where the line comes in. <br /> Page 5 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).