My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-05-2020 Park Commission Packet
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
2020
>
11-05-2020 Park Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2021 10:59:46 AM
Creation date
2/19/2021 10:58:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> Wednesday, September 10, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 27 <br /> <br />Edwards noted that came about as an aspiration after they had the Orono Rotary put together a project for <br />tree plantings last year, and they happened to have it at Lurton Park and Saga Hill. He said as they were <br />looking at it, one of the target parks for trees was French Creek Park and the thought was if anyone has <br />walked that park around the old sewage lagoon, many of those trees are falling into the water. The <br />thought process was if in the future it would make sense to do a sort of reforestation project where some <br />diseased, falling down or scrub trees would be removed and they could plant a mini arboretum with <br />specimen trees and plaques around that walk. <br />Roath asked who is assigned to French Creek Park. <br />Edwards replied it is currently vacant. <br />Roath noted they should get someone assigned to it and asked for a consensus on how big of a priority <br />this line item is. <br />Carter stated since it’s listed out under 2024, he doesn’t feel the need to worry about it much right now, <br />noting it’s a $20,000 item four years from now. <br />Roath said not to worry about what year it’s in for the document, he is asking if French Creek Park is <br />something the Commission wants to focus on. He noted they will get someone assigned to that park, they <br />will leave it in 2024 for now and if anyone proposes that the Commission work on that sooner or later or <br />not at all, they can take it up at that point. Roath asked if any Commissioners have an interest in that <br />park. <br />Edwards explained for anyone who has not been to French Creek Park that it is a nature park and is <br />basically a trail that goes around the former sewage lagoon before they integrated with the Met Council. <br />It is now a haven for water fowl, and said the past projects at the Park have been restoration of prairie and <br />a few Scout projects putting up benches to view the water fowl. He said it’s not a complicated park. <br />Berg said it’s more a wildlife area. <br />Carter suggested as they go into next year, in the same way they’ve done for the golf course and trails for <br />the parks, to have a strategic approach to the priorities. He noted he has a tough time doing it this way, <br />although they should get through it as they are halfway. He thinks if they were able to look at a column <br />and understand what is the No. 2 priority and the money is there, it makes sense. He said it’s kind of <br />throwing darts to him. <br />Roath replied there is a page that lists the 2020 focus parks, for instance the French Creek Park is not on <br />there for 2020 as it’s not a focus. <br />Edwards stated one of the things the Commission has done in the past is to drive what Committees they <br />want as some of the projects come forward, for example East Long Lake Trail, as it marched forward on <br />the calendar, the Commission formed a committee to help steer what that would actually look like. <br />Roath said he was using the CIP to start that prioritization and noted they could go alphabetically by park <br />name; however, they want to do it, but it should align with the focuses in 2020 and 2021.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.