My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-01-2020 Park Commission Packet
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
06-01-2020 Park Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2021 10:55:31 AM
Creation date
2/19/2021 10:55:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> Monday, March 2nd, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 8 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />Berg asked if the new trail would impact parking. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell stated he did not think so. He was told that it might use potentially five spots. <br /> <br />Stephens asked what the project cost would be. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell stated it is a bit of a moving target. When they talked about reducing square footage, they also <br />talked about using materials that may be more cost-efficient. They want to make the structure look nice <br />but be functional and cost-effective. They have the potential to get donated/discounted goods from <br />different companies because they are a non-profit. He estimated it could be near the million- dollar range. <br /> <br />Hudson asked if the organization could possibly leave the community if the proposal did not move <br />forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell said he cannot say it’s not possible; it could happen. It would not be their desire to have that <br />happen and they would look to any solution possible to stay. They would have to entertain other ideas and <br />opportunities if necessary, but they love it here and they think of themselves as part of the community. <br />Roath asked if the footprint of the building was to scale. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell indicated he believed so. <br /> <br />Roath asked if the footprint changed since the square footage changed. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell said the footprint is fairly similar. The changes took place on the second level where the <br />square footage and height was brought down in the hope the immediate neighbors had a better view. <br /> <br />Roath asked if the plan said the words “public restroom” or “public toilets.” <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell said he was correct; it is in the back of the building. <br /> <br />Berg asked if the height stayed the same. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell noted the height has been reduced from 2 stories to 1½ stories. <br /> <br />Stephens asked how the site was chosen for the initial proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell said they looked at the park, walked it with different officials and the landscape and architect <br />partner. The location was the only feasible location given the setbacks, the lake, and the wetlands. If they <br />would have put it in the parking lot, another parking lot would have had to be dug. <br /> <br />Roath asked if the boat launch was at the smaller northeast dock depicted on the plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell said it is farther up. <br /> <br />Roath asked if Mr. Burrell considered having the garages on the upstairs level so the path for the boats <br />could be out the east side of the building and down the hill and the longer dock could be located up near <br />the other dock, allowing the path to be away from the park and beach.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.