My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 3:57:08 PM
Creation date
2/17/2021 2:01:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FILE#LA20-000074 <br /> 16 Feb 2021 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,comfort <br /> or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br /> requested variance will not adversely impact health,safety,comfort, or morals; nor <br /> will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. <br /> 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br /> but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The application of the average <br /> lakeshore setback on this property severely limits the options for expanding and/or <br /> improving the home on the lake side;the granting of the requested variance is <br /> necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty resulting from the location of the existing <br /> home in relation to the neighboring homes.The existing hardcover exceeds permitted <br /> levels;the applicants'proposed removals will result in a 47 square foot reduction. <br /> The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br /> Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br /> impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br /> permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> Public Comments <br /> Two supportive comment letters from the neighbors on either side have been received and are <br /> attached as Exhibit F. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter <br /> the essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of an average lakeshore setback variance, and a hardcover <br /> variance with reductions as noted. Staff recommends denial of the two variances within the 75- <br /> foot setback.The deck should be reconfigured so that it does not encroach into the 75-foot <br /> setback. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Form <br /> Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey <br /> Exhibit D. Proposed Deck Plans and Elevations <br /> Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br /> Exhibit F. Neighbor Comments <br /> Exhibit G. Aerial Photos <br /> Exhibit H. Property Owners List <br /> Exhibit I. Plat Map <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.