My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
02-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 3:57:08 PM
Creation date
2/17/2021 2:01:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Michael Cox <br /> To: ,leremv Barnhart <br /> Subject: Orono Crossings <br /> Date: Saturday,February 13,2021 11:27:47 AM <br /> Orono Crossings <br /> Orono Planning Commission: <br /> My concerns are to urge the proposed project developer to consider further refinements critical <br /> to meeting expectations of the <br /> community and in so doing will help them create a better,more salable and valuable overall <br /> development. <br /> Other design commentary are provided to be considered for added value for needed design <br /> development. <br /> The following are comments that were discussed by myself and others at our meeting with the <br /> developers on February 11, 2021. <br /> Exterior quality materials <br /> Materials for Orono Crossing need to be of a similar quality to that of the surrounding <br /> community's. <br /> Stonebay and others are using Hardi Board cement siding rather than the developer's proposed <br /> vinyl siding. <br /> Suggest using the similar quality siding especially considering development's price point. <br /> Vinyl siding looks like replacement siding and can age a development's appearance. <br /> Holistic residential design qualities <br /> The presented development has : <br /> -Access issues which require <br /> visitors for many of the proposed residences to park at the rear of the unit with no easy path to <br /> the only entry point at the front door except a long walk. <br /> -Similar side by side design of the same basic proposed unit repeated 27 times can provide a <br /> flat monotony of sameness and will magnify the scale of an individual unit to be compared to <br /> one big large connected entity which needs to be segmented in order to reduce it to a <br /> residential scale. <br /> Suggest the developer try to solve many issues simultaneously or holistically to : <br /> -integrate objectives by breaking down the unit clusters with more individuality of a unit <br /> including roof articulations, color and detail by activating the facades. <br /> -Considering the many garage doors provide windows in doors as a nice feature and as a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.