My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-02-2020 Park Commission Packet
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
03-02-2020 Park Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2021 12:34:25 PM
Creation date
2/2/2021 12:32:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> Monday, January 6, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 11 <br /> <br />something together so the Clerk can put it out to the different venues. If the Planning Commission has <br />openings, they can adapt the verbiage for their purposes. <br /> <br />Edwards stated Item 2 is the previous year's version of the Park Commission’s Goals and Sub-Committee <br />Assignments. He highlighted in green the items the Commission wanted to do and he thought were done. <br />The non-highlighted items were things he thought were not done. Item 3, the 2020 version, is in the same <br />format. He did not add any focus areas. He removed items he thought were done. There may be items the <br />Commission no longer feels are focus areas; the Commission may also want to add some focus areas. He <br />included the City’s mission statement, vision statement, and goals, and also Code information which is <br />applicable to the Park Commission. <br /> <br />Chair said he appreciates the opportunity to be the Chair of the Park Commission. He shared his <br />philosophy regarding how the Park Commission should operate: He sees the Commissioners as less of a <br />company and more of a consulting partnership/consulting firm, where there are a lot of partners that have <br />their areas of interests, areas of expertise, and they are all pursuing those. The office managing partner, <br />similar to his role, is the person who tries to string a common thread between everyone and keep them <br />organized and helps support all the partners in their areas of interest. He is here to support the <br />Commissioners and their interests as well as interests that come from the City Council. <br /> <br />The Commissioners reviewed the 2019 Park Commission Focus Area/Committees and Goals document <br />as far as progress. Construction is almost done at Bederwood. It will be seeded in the spring, the wear <br />course of the asphalt poured in the parking lot, and then some touch-ups. The grand opening ceremony <br />will probably be in the September time frame if the event includes kids playing on the field. It was <br />proposed to remove the “grand-opening” item since it could be lumped in with Community Events. <br /> <br />Chair said East Long Lake Trail and Summit Beach is probably the Commission's biggest focus for the <br />year with respect to the Long Lake Rowing Club. He suggested creating a sub-committee regardless of <br />whether the rowing club plan moves forward to figure out what should be done with the project. <br /> <br />Edwards stated it is at 60% design on the trail portion of the project. Nothing else has been done with the <br />park portion, so there still should be a committee to move forward with the project. He will send out an <br />invite fairly soon for members to look at the 80% plan for the trail. <br /> <br />Chair asked if it made sense to split it into two groups. <br /> <br />Ruegemer did not think the Commission should add any group for the rowing club because it is a <br />proposal that has not been voted on. <br /> <br />Chair clarified that the two groups would be Summit Beach and the Trail. <br />Several Commissioners indicated they should be kept together because it is one project. <br /> <br />Ruegemer said she would like to remain on the project. <br /> <br />Walsh said the project would last a while and when it reaches 80% and even during construction the <br />committee could walk it and make sure it is getting done similar to the Commission’s vision. He felt it <br />made the most sense to be one project. <br /> <br />Berg said she would also like to remain on the committee since Summit Beach is her beach.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.