My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
01-19-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2021 11:06:44 AM
Creation date
1/22/2021 11:04:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Orono City Mayor Dennis Walsh <br /> Orono City Council Members <br /> October 26, 2020 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Second, granting variances in order to enable the construction of the proposed subdivision would <br /> "adversely affect the purpose and intent" of the Zoning Regulations and harm "the health [and] <br /> welfare of the public." (Sec. 78-121). Rather than being mindful of the "maintenance of open <br /> space and the avoidance of overcrowding of land," as the Zoning Regulations intended, this <br /> subdivision and its variances seek to prematurely overdevelop the Jacobs Family Trust. (Sec. 78- <br /> 5(a)(5)). <br /> The Jacobs Family Trust hopes to sidestep the need for individual lot variances through the <br /> creation and use of arbitrary ALS lines and blanket plat approval. Doubtless, this has something <br /> to do with the challenge of meeting the "practical difficulties"test of a variance or changing an <br /> ALS ordinance. But the reality is, the Jacobs Property is not unique; there are no practical <br /> difficulties to its development. The property can reasonably be developed at a lower density and <br /> meet all current codes. <br /> The Jacobs Family Trust desires to place more homes on the property is to obtain a better return <br /> for themselves. But this comes at the expense of the adjoining neighbors who have reasonably <br /> relied on the protections of the ALS for decades and to the potential detriment of the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the residents in the area. As stated by the City's own Ordinances, economic <br /> considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties for compromising the rights of adjoining <br /> property owners. <br /> Lots 2, 3 <br /> The City admits that proposed non-lakeshore lots 2 and 3 currently violate the established ALS <br /> and require a variance. Further, even as platted, these lots are non-compliant with code until <br /> combined with the outlots south of Shoreline Drive. (See the recording of the City Council Meeting <br /> dated September 14, 2020 at approximately the 43:20-44:00 mark.) <br /> Lot 6 <br /> The City proposes to establish an ALS line for lot 6 based on yet unbuilt lot 3 of Tanager Estates <br /> and 1125 Millston Road. However, because lot 3 is unbuilt, the current ALS for Lot 6 is equal to <br /> the setback distance of 1125 Millston Road from Tanager Lake, which would limit the ability to <br /> build on lot 6 of the prosed Jacobs Subdivision. This realignment of the ALS by the City makes <br /> lot 6 a buildable site, likely avoiding the need for yet another variance. (See the recording of the <br /> City Planning Commission Meeting dated August 17, 2020 at approximately the 2:12:00 mark.) <br /> The problem with the northeast corner of the Jacobs property is that it is not buildable. As will <br /> be discussed at the City Council meeting this evening, proposed ALS Line B for the seven lot <br /> development is the wrong ALS line and uses the wrong endpoint on the Burwell property. <br /> The home shown in Lot 6 cannot be built for these reasons. <br /> 9 <br /> 6573570v1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.