Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,July 15,2019 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> property on a quasi-peninsula and whether the City should also consider the number of feet to the <br /> neighboring structure,so it takes into consideration that shoreline point. <br /> Barnhart stated Bohns Point is a peninsula and currently the average lakeshore setback is a straight line, <br /> so the setback would be 150 feet. <br /> Ressler stated that is kind of what he is getting at and that a straight line does not seem to be fair for that <br /> lot,which should be taken into consideration. <br /> Libby stated he tends to agree from the standpoint of how they look at the metrics. When there is <br /> something that has irregularities,it is not uncommon to take the measured empirical distance from either <br /> the center line of the street or curb,measure back a block's worth of properties,and then divide the <br /> number of properties within that block. Instead what the City is trying to deal with is a very static line <br /> that does not take into account the irregular shoreline. <br /> Barnhart noted Staff does use its average measuring tool for some nonconforming properties but not for <br /> lakeshore lots. The problem with the average number for most situations is that the line is logical. The <br /> view is established by where the structure is. <br /> Libby stated as long as that stays the static purpose,there is no way to do it differently. Preserving the <br /> lakeshore is important and is similar to the dock alignments,which is very complicated. The LMCD <br /> attempts to have something fair and reasonable so the docks line up but the lakeshore is not linear and <br /> does not take into account that the lakeshore differs. <br /> McCutcheon stated he agrees it is a problem and that perhaps they could look at having some sort of <br /> minimum for the neighborhood. <br /> Barnhart stated in his view,if the average lakeshore setback is 219 feet,there should be some sort of <br /> maximum lakeshore setback since there are probably some situations where the house is 450 feet back. <br /> The question then becomes,is it fair to have that lot set the average lakeshore setback for the neighboring <br /> house and should it be protected as much as the homes on Casco Point where they are all lined up. <br /> Barnhart stated that type of situation should be part of any discussion since that creates some of the <br /> issues. While a new ordinance is not going to eliminate all variances,it could help reduce it somewhat. <br /> Hollis stated he would be in favor of eliminating it,which should be brought forward for discussion. <br /> Gettman commented they also did not discuss vegetation that can obstruct a view. In the application <br /> earlier,there were some trees that were blocking the view and the other neighbor was willing to remove <br /> those. Having that as part of the discussion would also be helpful. If one property owner puts in a bunch <br /> of trees,it ends up defeating the purpose of having these protections. <br /> Barnhart noted the Council did look at regulating landscaping in the lake yard in the past and ultimately <br /> discarded any changes because they did not want to get into regulating that. The City is trying to protect <br /> the lake but they also want to preserve a natural view. <br /> Gettman stated enforcement of the ordinance also needs to be looked at. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />