My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-07-2020 City Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
12-07-2020 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 8:20:36 AM
Creation date
1/14/2021 8:20:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,December 7,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING—Continued <br /> Seals moved,Johnson seconded,to waive the Planning Commission review. Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. <br /> Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. <br /> Seals moved,Johnson seconded,to approve the Resolution LA20-000072. Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> 22. LA20-000048—Timothy Whitten o/b/o Irwin Jacobs 2018 Rev Trust, 1700 Shoreline Drive <br /> Preliminary Plat—Resolution <br /> Mayor Walsh clarified the expectation of the Council on this:they are not making a decision or having <br /> conversation around this,but rather the Applicant will give a quick update. He noted this is not a public <br /> hearing as it still needs to go back through the Planning Commission. <br /> Patrick Steinhoff of Malkerson, Gunn, and Martin,220 South 6th Street,Minneapolis, is the Attorney for <br /> the Applicant, which is the Irwin Jacobs Trust. Mr. Steinhoff gave an update on the application based on <br /> issues from the last meeting on October 26, 2020. One issue was a suggestion that they were moving too <br /> fast,making changes on the fly in response to public comments without allowing sufficient time for the <br /> public to consider them. At the suggestion of City Staff, City Attorney, and City Planner,the Applicant <br /> has agreed to return the application to the Planning Commission for a full public hearing. Right now, <br /> they are updating all of the application materials, and once Staff has given feedback,there will be <br /> neighbor meetings,they will invite Councilmembers to view the site, basically starting the application <br /> from scratch. As to the nature of the changes to the Application;the Council may recall there was lots of <br /> discussion regarding average lakeshore setback(ALS) in past meetings. The Applicant is revising the <br /> plan to move all of the lots so they have house pads behind the existing ALS, and that required them to <br /> eliminate a lot and that will hopefully eliminate the ALS as an issue. Another change to the plans regards <br /> some objection to the road so they are redesigning the road to make the cul-de-sac shorter and if Staff <br /> identifies any other issues,the Applicant will address those as they come up and make adjustments to the <br /> plan. The plan is to give the Council an application that conforms to the ordinances and then they can <br /> make adjustments based on feedback. Mr. Steinhoff welcomed questions and noted Tim Whitten is also <br /> in attendance if there are questions. He looks forward to the public hearing on the application. <br /> Mayor Walsh noted they are not looking for questions at this point,but they do look forward to seeing the <br /> Applicant at the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Once it gets through that process, it will <br /> get back in front of the Council. He appreciates the update and where the Applicant is going with it. <br /> 24. LA20-000071—Jacob Stickney, 15 Stubbs Bay Road/PID 3211823340006,Variances— <br /> Resolution <br /> Ms. Oakden noted the Applicant is requesting the lot area, lot width, and side yard setback variances. The <br /> Applicant is planning to construct a new home on the property which currently sits vacant;the proposed <br /> home has a similar front yard setback as the neighboring property to the north. During the Planning <br /> Commission, neighbors did attend and voiced some concern regarding the original proposed house 24. <br /> Page 7 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.