My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/23/07 - re: proposed sewer extention - baldur park road
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1340 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0015
>
Coddon-Koseck (lake use issue)
>
03/23/07 - re: proposed sewer extention - baldur park road
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:43:25 PM
Creation date
1/8/2021 10:48:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1340
Street Name
Baldur Park
Street Type
Road
Address
1340 Baldur Park Rd
PIN
0811723310015
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Baldur Park Sewer Extension <br /> March 23,2007 <br /> Page 2 <br /> proposed by Coddon must then be a public system, as the LR-1C zone does not allow <br /> duplex or multi-family dwellings. Should the system be within a dedicated extension of <br /> the public street or within easements over private property? Why is the system being <br /> proposed now, prior to a zoning application to determine the buildability and ultimate <br /> layout of the properties, roadways, utility easements, etc.? <br /> It is my opinion that this request is premature and should be reviewed only in the context <br /> of a comprehensive review of potential development of the properties, which will only be <br /> accomplished by an application by Mr. Coddon for development of the properties. <br /> With regard to the design, it appears that as many as seven (7) sanitary services are <br /> spread out along the length of the proposed extension, to potentially serve properties that <br /> may ultimately prove unbuildable. A 1982 preliminary plat approval granted by the City <br /> for this property resulted in only 3 building sites (2 plus the Puzak residence) after many <br /> iterations. That subdivision was never completed. It is my opinion that approval of 7 <br /> units on the property is extremely unlikely, given that City ordinances have become even <br /> more restrictive in the past 25 years. <br /> Matt - please review the applicant's purchase agreement (attached) and let me know <br /> whether it is valid. It has language regarding a 120-day `condition period' that is <br /> undefined, and if it began on the date the agreement was signed, the agreement has <br /> expired. I would also like your advise on how to respond to Coddon's sewer permit <br /> request, considering all the issues noted above. <br /> Tom - please provide a verbal cursory review of the plans and advise me if there are any <br /> glaring issues that I should be aware of. Since Coddon's sewer connection permit <br /> application does not obligate him to pay consultant costs, I am hesitant to incur more than <br /> perhaps an hour of your time at this point in assisting to determine an appropriate <br /> response to Coddon. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> //XII' <br /> Michael P. Gaffron <br /> Planning Director <br /> cc: Ron Moorse <br /> Encl. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.