Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3244 <br /> � November 20,2006 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> 2. Pi�ior to last year a house had existed on the 1�roperty since 1958. <br /> 3. There is no adjacent property the applicaut could acquire to enlarge the lot. <br /> 4. There are numerous lots with houses in the immedi�te vicinity of this property tl�at <br /> �re of similar size so the proposed house would not be out of character with the <br /> suri•ounding area. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> Are there any oiher issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Plaiuling StafF recommends approval of the lot area variance subject to the grading and site <br /> plans being revised to address the issues outlined in the City Engineez•'s report, and that no <br /> other variances are granted for redevelopnient of the property. <br />