Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,November 23,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> CONSENT AGENDA—Continued <br /> Crosby moved,Johnson seconded,to approve the Consent Agenda as revised,with Items No.4,5, <br /> 11, and 13 removed.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> CITY ATTORNEY REPORT <br /> 16. SECOND AMENDMENT DEDICATED CITY <br /> Mattick stated this is an item the Council discussed at their previous meeting and at the study session earlier <br /> this evening. He explained that the resolution for Council consideration expresses support for the second <br /> amendment in its fullest sense and supports the rights conferred by the second amendment. <br /> Walsh noted there was a member of the public that was here to comment on this item and asked them to <br /> come to the podium and state their name and address for the record. <br /> Brad Evans, 6041 Hermitage Trail, Minnestrista, thanked the Council for considering adoption of this <br /> resolution because, in this day and age, it takes a lot of guts to do something like this. He stated that they <br /> are law abiding citizens and as a member of the Minnetonka Sportsmen's Club,he wanted to let the Council <br /> know that they appreciate and respect what this Council is doing with this resolution. <br /> Crosby read aloud the resolution language. <br /> Crosby moved,Johnson seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 7140,a Resolution Declaring <br /> Orono a Second Amendment Dedicated City.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> Walsh noted, as suggested by Councilmember Printup,every month the Council pulls up an item under the <br /> Bill of Rights,talks about it a little bit, and has a Resolution in support of each item. <br /> 2019 TRANSFER—PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT(formerly Consent Agenda item#4) <br /> Walsh stated that he is assuming the overage is what was planned for the roads budget for 2020 and asked <br /> if he was mistaken and it was actually for the roads budget for 2021. <br /> Edwards stated that the overage would be for the 2021 roads budget. <br /> Walsh stated that would mean the City is already starting out with $717,000 and then has about $125,000 <br /> with the cell tower revenue and about$641,000 in the pavement management levy. <br /> Rief noted there was$717,000 in the pavement management levy. <br /> Ung clarified that this is for the roads budget for 2020 and not 2021. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />