My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-07-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
12-07-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2020 10:09:30 AM
Creation date
12/8/2020 9:56:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
592
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br />14. THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT – Continued <br /> <br />Crosby asked if the revenues were calculated for Building Permits at the time of the application. He would <br />like to see how many dollars of open Building Permits there are in the City that have not yet been closed. <br /> <br />Ung stated this information has not yet been collected. <br /> <br />Crosby stated he thinks the vast majority are gathered at the time of application, but he would like to know <br />how many open permits are still out there. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the information in the report just goes through the end of September, so there will still be <br />October, November, and possibly December for the fourth quarter. <br /> <br />Johnson stated he would like to see how long the City’s permit cycle is because that may be a better indicator <br />to help the Council forecast. He stated this information shows when the permits originate, but lots of things <br />can happen and the permits are staying open. He noted this information will also speak to the workflow <br />because this current information is not necessarily indicative of workflow since it only shows when they <br />pulled the permit. <br /> <br />Crosby stated he assumes this data would be fairly easy to pull through Citizen Serve. <br /> <br />Ung reviewed the revenue comparison by quarters and explained that the City is just a little below last year <br />for third quarter and reiterated they are still expecting to meet budget. She reviewed the expenditures and <br />noted there are two departments that are trending over budget which are Mayor and Council, which is due <br />to a change in cost for producing meeting minutes, but noted that it is a relatively small line item. <br /> <br />Johnson noted he feels the new minutes vendor does not do a super job. <br /> <br />Seals asked if that meant he wanted to investigate other possibilities for the minutes. <br /> <br />Johnson stated the Council just renewed the contract on the Consent Agenda. <br /> <br />Rief noted there are not a lot of options out there for contractors to take minutes in this capacity. <br /> <br />Ung reiterated the Golf Course is over budget which is due to more maintenance and bank fees, but those <br />expenditures are off-set with the higher revenue intake. She stated overall, the third quarter is looking good <br />and she expects the City to finish the year off under budget. She reviewed the top vendors for the third <br />quarter as well as year to date. <br /> <br />Seals noted the Parks Commission has asked for a Master Plan for the golf course and suggested a meeting <br />to be scheduled regarding this issue. <br /> <br />Edwards noted they did one about four years ago but can revisit the issue if that is the desire. <br /> <br />Walsh reviewed some of the items included in the master plan. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.