My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
11-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 2:49:16 PM
Creation date
7/15/2015 2:52:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 23, 2006 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />(5. #05-3080 INTERSPACE WEST, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br /> <br />Anders stated there was a laundry list of things that had to be accomplished during that time period and <br />that only one issue remains to be resolved. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the stormwater issue is a huge issue and should have been resolved prior to the deadline <br />expiring. <br /> <br />Anders commented he does not see how requiring a new application would benefit anyone. <br /> <br />Sansevere inquired what a renewal would entail. <br /> <br />Brokl stated if an extension on the preliminary plat is granted, the Council would need to grant approval <br />on the final plat that is in substantial conformity with the preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Sansevere inquired whether this application could be tabled. <br /> <br />Brokl stated tabling the application would also imply approval. <br /> <br />Anders stated it was their understanding that they would be able to address two of the three items. <br /> <br />Murphy commented they are being addressed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated functionally approving a renewal of the preliminary plat approval would be the same as <br />approving it and that options 2 and 3 would be essentially the same thing. <br /> <br />Anders stated they did approach the City prior to October 10th and request an extension. <br /> <br />Gina Carlson stated she has been in contact with Planner Gaffron all along and that they had to wait until <br />October 5th when Planner Gaffron was back in the office. <br /> <br />Sansevere commented Planner Gaffron’s absence did not affect the applicant’s ability to apply for the <br />Mn/DOT permits. <br /> <br />Anders stated they had requested to be on the agenda for the first council meeting in October to ask for an <br />extension. Anders stated he has seen other councils extend deadlines. <br /> <br />Sansevere requested the City Attorney explain the law that the City has to follow and the ramifications <br />that would result if an extension were given. <br /> <br />Brokl stated the risk would be that approval of the preliminary and final plat would be given and approval <br />would not given by Mn/DOT for utilities or stormwater and access. Brokl stated at a minimum the <br /> <br />Council would have to do a conditional plat approval, which would result in options two and three <br />leading to the same result. <br /> <br />Sansevere stated theoretically if there is a denial by Mn/DOT, they would not have to do any wastewater <br />management. <br /> <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />PAGE 8 of 12 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda 11-13-06 <br />Approval of Counil Minutes 10-23-06[Page 8 of 12]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.