My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-26-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:40:47 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:36:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 24 <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh replied, generally speaking it has to be built to code but they can still build like- <br />and-kind from a height. If they are in a non-conforming use and are two feet and supposed to be <br />seven-and-a-half feet and tear down to the studs, they can build it back right where it was. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy replied they are building it right where it was; however, they are just changing the <br />roof pitch. <br /> <br />Johnson noted that is where the problem lies; the minute they make a roof go higher than the <br />existing, that is where the Council hasn’t been allowing it. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if the current roof pitch would not be to code. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy answered the current roof structure, the framing and the span of the roof trusses is <br />not to code. <br /> <br />Crosby responded, like Mayor Walsh said, if they build it to like-and-kind, they are not raising <br />the roof or creating their own difficulties. <br /> <br />Johnson said that is right, the Applicant can do that. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy said he could supersede code if he builds to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Johnson noted he is confusing code with the basic umbrella of space that they have. He said <br />what happens underneath the parameters of the existing structure is Mr. Murphy’s job as a <br />builder to make sure it meets code. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy asked if the walls stay the same height, for example the walls are eight feet tall, his <br />building code tells him that the span of the rafters must a 2x10 or a 2x12 rafter. He said <br />currently they are either 2x4 or 2x6 in the structure, so now he is increasing the height of that <br />roof. <br /> <br />Johnson said they would have to drop the walls or make it a flat roof and noted the Council <br />doesn’t get into the business of designing structures for people, but clarified that Mr. Murphy has <br />the envelope to utilize and underneath that it is Mr. Murphy’s job to make sure it meets code, and <br />must come up with his own design to fit these parameters. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy asked, doesn’t that create a practical difficulty because the code compliance he must <br />follow by a licensed contractor is a practical difficulty in this, as now he must alter the structure <br />in a way that would make it less effective than it is now. He noted he would have to drop the <br />side walls to get the structure roofline to line up and have the correct pitch and width of rafters. <br />He said now he is in a catch-22 because it would be even shorter than it was and less effect ive on <br />the inside as a storage unit or whatever it will be. He stated he is not here to argue but he is <br />trying to show the Council where his catch-22 comes in because he knows exactly what they are <br />talking about but now they have to go backwards.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.