Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 17 of 24 <br /> <br />the subdivision code; there is some discussion about where the 18% dry-buildable calculation <br />came from and Staff was directed to look into State statute and other regulations. Barnhart could <br />not find the source, so he is led to the conclusion that the City can establish whatever they want <br />in terms of a definition of dry-buildable, so if the Council doesn’t want to include the 18% they <br />can remove it, or they can have a 22.5% slope, although that is a very specific number. He <br />suggested doing a round number of 30% which is similar to a bluff slope without being a bluff. <br />Johnson asked what money it saves doing the summary ordinance rather than publishing the full <br />39 pages. <br />Barnhart responded it is several hundred dollars because when they pass an ordinance they are <br />required to publish it and 39 pages published in the newspaper will be very expensive, probably <br />close to $1,500. <br />Johnson noted he is fine with the summary and said he did some research on the subject. He <br />thinks the engineering grade is a 3:1 ratio, which is not to exceed 33%; if the City wants it rooted <br />in something, this is the ordinary engineering maximum standard in grading. He said this <br />excludes defined bluffs and wetlands, so they are talking about dry-buildable for the calculation <br />and he suggests 33%. <br />Mayor Walsh said it will potentially add more dry-buildable to sites. <br />Johnson noted one wor karound is if the City keeps it at 22%, they grade that as they do more <br />earth work to get it “flatter.” If the City uses the 3:1 ratio, they can actually preserve some areas <br />from being re-graded to meet the standard. <br />Mayor Walsh asked what the downside is. <br />Barnhart replied they may see some areas that would have been excluded before will now be <br />included in the minimum. He remembers early in the development of t he YMCA project at 135 <br />Orono Road, the dry-buildable calculation was very critical because in creating a non-sewered <br />lot , the dry-buildable area needs to be contiguous. Therefore that 18% was critical in how the lot <br />lines were created. He noted they frankly don’t have a huge number of vacant lots it would <br />apply to, so that is the downside and he doesn’t know how big of a ramification that will be in <br />the long-term. He clarified the downside is in areas where previously they could fit 5 lots, they <br />may be able to fit 7 lots. <br />Mayor Walsh said that is not a downside to him. <br />Johnson noted the 18% is a 20-year-old rule that was an old septic requirement. <br />Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to give Staff permission to publish the summary ordinance. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to use the 3:1 or 33% ratio for dry-buildable. VOTE: Ayes 4, <br />Nays 0.