Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 15 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />Crosby moved, Seals seconded, to approve LA20-000060 – City of Orono Text Amendment <br />Related to Amendments to Variances as drafted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />19. LA20-000047 – CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO BOAT <br /> STORAGE <br /> <br />Barnhart said when he first started in Orono, the direction he received from the City Council was <br />there are quite a bit of rules and regulations and occasionally it will be necessary to review those, <br />re-open the book and take a look at it. He noted this is a good example; regulations are in place <br />that guide the storage of boats on residential property and noted he included a copy of the section <br />in the Code in the packet and it is a mess. There is an opportunity to re-examine what the goals <br />are as a Council and then Staff and the City Attorney can draft an ordinance that meets those <br />goals. Barnhart is looking for feedback from the Council on the 16 questions onscreen/in the <br />packet. He noted they can schedule the discussion for an upcoming work session and asked the <br />Council to look at the questions and start putting their questions and feedback together. <br /> <br />Mr. Richie Anderson said this was done not that many years ago and the previous ordinance was <br />for storage of a 23 foot boat and one of the former Councilmembers wanted to store a bigger boat <br />in his yard, so he came and made it a 30 foot boat. Mr. Anderson said a bunch of the things <br />listed on screen are irrelevant; he knows what the rules are because he sat here when the Council <br />went through it talking about 30 foot boats in people’s yards, he thought it was kind of ridiculous <br />at that time. He said the City can’t even enforce what they have right now, noting there are <br />many boats that are over 30 feet being stored right now. He again said this was just done and he <br />questions why it came up again at this time. <br />Mayor Walsh stated the reason it came up is because the City had a court case that said what <br />they have is not enforceable, so the prosecuting attorney said the City needs to fix their code <br />because it is inconsistent and unenforceable. <br />Mr. Anderson said one other part is that a property owner had an old wooden boat with a blue <br />tarp on it for approximately 10 years, then this rule went in to place that people cannot have a <br />derelict boat in their yard for 2 years. He noted some of the terminology was directly related to <br />that homeowner and he subsequently moved his boat. <br />Mayor Walsh said this is really trying to solve those issues and suggested a work session where <br />the Council can really talk through it. <br />Mr. Anderson asked if the City lost the court case. <br />Mayor Walsh replied in the affirmative. <br />City Attorney Mattick said when Barnhart started working on this and asked for some help, one <br />of the questions Mr. Mattick always asks instead of mandating something: is what they were