My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-26-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:40:47 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:36:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 12 of 24 <br /> <br />Johnson said that is horse manure. <br />Mayor Walsh stated that is a good question before they even have the discussion. <br />Seals asked why they wouldn’t get credit for what they did versus, for example, zoning swamp <br />land for 10-15 units/acre and walk away and never build on it because they cannot. <br />Mayor Walsh suggested creating a new zoning of 6-10 units/acre. <br />Barnhart stated the Council can do that. <br />Mayor Walsh stated then it would be guided for 6 units/acre. <br />Barnhart noted they would need to create a new land-use category of 6-10 units/acre and then <br />create a new zoning district. <br />Johnson said they should’ve been doing this a while ago. <br />Barnhart stated he did not run a calculation for 6 units/acre, but at 3 units/acre, the City would <br />have to create more opportunity. <br />Johnson noted the next category is 10-20 units/acre, so if they are at 10 it’s the same as being at <br />20, and asked if that is correct. <br />Barnhart replied no, if they are in the 3-10 units/acre group, it calculates as 3 units/acre, if they <br />are in the 10-20 group, it calculates as 10 units/acre. <br />Mayor Walsh said the Council guides it for the Met Council and decides what bucket it falls in. <br />That is why he suggested creating a new 6-10 units/acre grouping. <br />Johnson stated this is the type of housing they want at that location. <br />Mayor Walsh said yes. He asked Barnhart what the location is currently per acre. <br />Barnhart answered it is at 9.5 units/acre. <br />Mayor Walsh said technically they are almost at 10, so if they can get one more unit in. <br />Barnhart stated they would need two more units. <br />Mayor Walsh noted two more units would be 6 across the street and 10 at this location so it is a <br />bit denser, but makes the City not have to go somewhere else to change density. He noted they <br />need to decide if they want 10 units/acre to begin with or if they only want 6 units/acre. <br />Barnhart clarified 3.69 acres at 6 units/acre; the Met Council expects 18 units or so for this <br />property. At 10 units/acre for the 3.69 acres, they’d be looking at 36.9 units. He noted that is the <br />difference, they need to find the 18 spaces or lots somewhere else. This is the reason he suggests <br />rather than opening that potential can of worms, the City allows for 2 more units here, which <br />may likely manifest itself in adjusted setbacks internally and externally, but allows the City to do
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.