Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 12 of 24 <br /> <br />Johnson said that is horse manure. <br />Mayor Walsh stated that is a good question before they even have the discussion. <br />Seals asked why they wouldn’t get credit for what they did versus, for example, zoning swamp <br />land for 10-15 units/acre and walk away and never build on it because they cannot. <br />Mayor Walsh suggested creating a new zoning of 6-10 units/acre. <br />Barnhart stated the Council can do that. <br />Mayor Walsh stated then it would be guided for 6 units/acre. <br />Barnhart noted they would need to create a new land-use category of 6-10 units/acre and then <br />create a new zoning district. <br />Johnson said they should’ve been doing this a while ago. <br />Barnhart stated he did not run a calculation for 6 units/acre, but at 3 units/acre, the City would <br />have to create more opportunity. <br />Johnson noted the next category is 10-20 units/acre, so if they are at 10 it’s the same as being at <br />20, and asked if that is correct. <br />Barnhart replied no, if they are in the 3-10 units/acre group, it calculates as 3 units/acre, if they <br />are in the 10-20 group, it calculates as 10 units/acre. <br />Mayor Walsh said the Council guides it for the Met Council and decides what bucket it falls in. <br />That is why he suggested creating a new 6-10 units/acre grouping. <br />Johnson stated this is the type of housing they want at that location. <br />Mayor Walsh said yes. He asked Barnhart what the location is currently per acre. <br />Barnhart answered it is at 9.5 units/acre. <br />Mayor Walsh said technically they are almost at 10, so if they can get one more unit in. <br />Barnhart stated they would need two more units. <br />Mayor Walsh noted two more units would be 6 across the street and 10 at this location so it is a <br />bit denser, but makes the City not have to go somewhere else to change density. He noted they <br />need to decide if they want 10 units/acre to begin with or if they only want 6 units/acre. <br />Barnhart clarified 3.69 acres at 6 units/acre; the Met Council expects 18 units or so for this <br />property. At 10 units/acre for the 3.69 acres, they’d be looking at 36.9 units. He noted that is the <br />difference, they need to find the 18 spaces or lots somewhere else. This is the reason he suggests <br />rather than opening that potential can of worms, the City allows for 2 more units here, which <br />may likely manifest itself in adjusted setbacks internally and externally, but allows the City to do