Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 24 <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh said perhaps they should table because there is no practical difficulty for the <br />Applicant to move halfway into the setback. <br /> <br />Mr. Briggs feels there is a covenant of good faith in dealing with these things, and he deals with <br />this at work all the time; he has taken 4 variances down to 1 and he believes a single variance has <br />been granted recently. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh stated they should find it. <br /> <br />Crosby suggested tabling, they will see if they can find the variance, and noted he is on the fence <br />with this and there is a possibility of a practical difficulty with Mr. Brigg’s family member. He <br />said they should find more backing evidence to give the Applicant some more ammo. <br /> <br />Crosby moved, Johnson seconded, to table LA20-000057, 1985 Fagerness Point Road, <br />Variances. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />17. LA20-000052 – MARK RAUSCH O/B/O UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS AND <br />DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES, NW CORNER OF WILLOW DRIVE AND WAYZATA <br />BLVD., CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW <br />Aziz Saddiqui, O/B/O David Weekley Homes, Applicant, was present. <br />Staff presented summary packet of information. The main issue the Planning Commission had <br />with this project was nine-or-so units encroached into the setbacks. The Applicant heard the <br />comments from the Planning Commission and adjusted the plan, relocating the tall lot to the <br />interior of the project and redesigned the project. Mr. Barnhart said Staff is looking for some <br />preliminary comment; this project will likely be developed as a Residential Planned Unit <br />Development (RPUD) zoning district, will require a public hearing from a zone change and a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment because they are lower density than what is prescribed by the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Mayor Walsh asked regarding the Met Council, they obviously want to see lower density on this <br />as it relates to the project across the street, but the issue he read was by lowering this they still <br />stay above their number of 3 units/acre for density. He said it would force them to raise numbers <br />elsewhere and is it possible that they would not need to raise numbers elsewhere because they <br />are above the “3” number. <br />Barnhart replied when looking at a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a project like this, they <br />must establish a guide; he noted Orono’s land-use designations are: low -density is .5 – 2 <br />units/acre and goes up to 3-10 units/acre, 10-20 units/acre , and 20-25 units/acre. They like to fit <br />a development within those parameters. The Met Council looks at the lowest number in the <br />range that the City prescribes – the high-density residential is 20-25 units/acre and the Met <br />Council calculates a potential of 20 units, even though some projects may be higher. Other areas