Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 21, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 1 of 1 <br /> <br />8. LA20-000060 CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO AMENDMENTS <br />TO VARIANCES. STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART. <br />Barnhart said when the Commission reviews a variance, they see the plans attached. When those <br />variances are approved, those plans are attached to the resolution. Occasionally some minor changes <br />need to be made that are identified during the construction process. If those changes are minor but still <br />would require a variance, Staff has taken those through the City Council process and at an open meeting, <br />Council can say this minor change is appropriate and they are going to amend the resolution. If it’s a <br />major change, they go through the process of public hearings and all of that. He said that is the practice <br />they’ve been doing for 15-20 years. The City Code technically doesn’t allow that practice, and the City <br />Attorney has suggested they adjust the code to allow that practice just described (Planning Staff makes a <br />determination if a proposed amendment is appropriate or minor, if the Council concurs, they can approve <br />that minor change, if not, they can remand it back through the public hearing process. He noted this <br />ordinance codifies what Barnhart has just described. Staff recommends approval as drafted. <br />Gettman asked Barnhart how they continue to document the minor changes. <br />Barnhart replied they re-publish the resolution with new drawings. He said the reason they’re doing this <br />for the variance process is because State statute doesn’t require public hearing for variances, it is Orono’s <br />own rule, so in the City Attorney’s view they can adjust it that way. <br />Chair Ressler noted the scope is two-fold, one is to preserve time, because it seemed to be a minor <br />change, and two being mindful that if there is something the Council would like the Commission’s <br />feedback, they can send it back to them. He said it doesn’t relieve the Commission of being able to weigh <br />in if the Council has discretion and opinion to do so. <br />Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 9:24 p.m. <br />Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 9:24 p.m. <br />Kirchner moved, Gettman seconded, to approve LA20-000060 City of Orono Text Amendment <br />Related to Amendments to Variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />