Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 21, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />intentions are of the City to achieve as many units as possible, while at the same time can they offset the <br />setbacks and come up with a building layout that is not directly exposed to those two streets (which they <br />did), and in order to enhance and protect the safety of what Mr. Libby said, they have nice ornamental <br />fencing, with nice piers, columns, entry features and brick monuments on all corners of the property. He <br />noted they are respecting conditions by bringing in a product that will support that corner, and they may <br />be able to play with the topline area and bring them inside what Mr. Barnhart is recommending. If they <br />work with the certain setbacks, this project will work; however, if they stick by the book of 15 feet, 50 <br />feet and 50 feet, the project is dead. He noted that is where they are at today, and it would be nice if after <br />the meeting he could go back to the team and say they have some direction. <br />Kirchner asked regarding the side portion along 40 and 43: if they did away with it and did not count it as <br />recreational space, would they still meet the 10%. <br />Rausch said they’d be about 3,000-3,500 feet short. <br />Kirchner said right alongside those buildings, it’s not really something the people residing there would <br />view as a public space, but rather viewed as the side to a building or side-yard. He would appreciate a bit <br />more thought as to how they can incorporate a little more square footage that way. <br />Mr. Saddiqui said to open up the thought process of what was initially proposed or thought, as to the very <br />high density…they were very skeptical if it was going to work in this location with the number of units <br />because they were going down to 60% of what was proposed. If they are going to stick with some of <br />those side-yard scenarios, it would shrink significantly. <br />Chair Ressler stated Orono and Burnsville are probably different, and Orono prides itself as a rural area, <br />although it is becoming more dense, which is something requested by the Met Council, and it hasn’t <br />necessarily been welcomed. He noted some of the applicants today with single family residence being <br />built 30 feet from a property for one home and having resistance against that. He said density is a valid <br />question and the Applicant is trying to figure out what this will work for and where it will work, and <br />Chair Ressler isn’t sure it’s Orono. He said the way it was guided was perhaps more units, but also <br />perhaps more centralized and they’ve seen other concept plans (preliminary) which were proposed and <br />after the Commission’s feedback they haven’t worked out because it centralizes the units which gives <br />more green space and softens the approach, which the Commission likes. At the same time, by not <br />centralizing and reducing the number of units, it can also be a burden because in this case they’re <br />spreading out the units and the total is less, but the effect is more because they’re not centralized. Chair <br />Ressler tries to stay open-minded because this is a new concept and new concepts have followed trends <br />and that is how they get established. He knows it’s difficult to see and while looking at the plan, it looks <br />daunting as there is no softening or trees proposed. To summarize, Wayzata Boulevard is a very busy <br />road and represents Orono…he thinks the 50 foot setback is probably his feedback for that area. He noted <br />36 feet is agreeable on Kelley Parkway and Willow Drive, reluctantly. To summarize, because they’re <br />talking about less units but more sprawl, he’d like to see a larger setback and that may be a problem for <br />the development, but that is his personal perspective. <br />Gettman noted what the Applicant is hearing loud and clear is that the concept of setbacks, and he asked <br />if they can put a different type of unit with the other units. Specifically, can they mix a higher density <br />building within there somewhere, especially as they play around with the outlot, and even potentially with <br />commercial on the first floor and units above. Rather than trying to shove or piecemeal things around, he