Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 21, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />density is one of the areas throughout the country where they’ve been very successful. In looking at this <br />project and the way it’s located and the way the buildings are laid out, they’ve tried their best not to have <br />the exposure on the outer part of the community (Willow and Wayzata). Mr. Saddiqui said the front of <br />the house is towards the back, and serves very well on parcels like this one, and there are many <br />commercial areas around it. He noted he is a little fearful of relocating the outlot as they will end up <br />losing more units and the project wouldn’t be as viable as it stands. Looking at the number of units, it <br />makes more sense to have 45-56 units, and came up with the best plan for what the lot is like. The price <br />range will be approximately $360,000 to the low $400,000 range. <br />Libby asked if there is a Home Owner’s Association (HOA). <br />Mr. Saddiqui replied yes, the HOA is responsible for everything except sewer and water. <br />Libby asked if they know what the HOA dues would be. <br />Mr. Saddiqui did not know. <br />Libby asked if on other projects, the dues are based on square footage. <br />Mr. Saddiqui responded they are relatively the same, and the units are all mostly the same square footage. <br />He said this is a new product in this market and they need to explore with the Association here. <br />Kirchner said it looks like there are 100 feet of variation on the three different floor plans proposed with <br />the smallest being 1,750 and the largest being 1,850. <br />Barnhart said at the sketch plan level they don’t expect a huge amount of detail and things will change <br />and that is why they don’t go into depth with the utility planning and things like that. They generally try <br />to call out the high points. <br />Gettman noted Mr. Barnhart brought up the fact that the outlot of the park area might be more open to the <br />public as opposed to trying to gate the community and restrict it and asked if it would be as open if they <br />flipped the outlot with Building 3739, thinking about the younger children who would use the playground <br />and having them not exposed to the Kelley Parkway traffic. <br />Mr. Saddiqui said the only reason he proposed fencing along the North with a gate is because people <br />prefer that. He noted another way they could address it is with evergreens to create screening. He said he <br />could look into flipping the buildings and said he’s trying to avoid the setbacks and then there is always <br />the fear of losing more units. <br />Gettman said looking across the street and to the left of the circle, it is well within the 15 feet. He noted <br />the perimeter setbacks are sacred for the Commission as opposed to the space between the buildings, <br />because they’re already townhomes. <br />Mr. Saddiqui said one of the things they’ve done is to stay in three and four units, as people get more <br />space, more lights, more windows, and that is what they prefer. He said he would try to look into <br />possibly flip-flopping the buildings. <br />Libby said he’s familiar with some of the concepts having to do with playgrounds, parks, and in this case <br />an outlet. He asked if there is any engineering or design rationale that has to do with environment or