My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA20-52 <br />September 21, 2020 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />foot setback off of Wayzata. Staff recommends that a 30 foot setback be provided on all exterior <br />streets, to allow for enhanced landscaping as characterized by Stonebay. The proposed setback <br />to the west (pond) is shown as 12.9, where 35 feet is required. It should be also noted that ‘in no <br />case’ shall the setback be less than the height of the building. Buildings are expected to be two <br />story, no higher than 30 feet. <br /> <br />Setbacks, internal. In a townhome development, property lines are generally established at the <br />border of the building, with at least one building wall shared by the adjoining unit. In these <br />developments, the primary focus is the distance between buildings, and the distances between <br />the garage door and the street. The Orono Preserve development (a single family RPUD) <br />provided a minimum of 15 feet between buildings, in a combination of 5, 7.5, and 10 foot <br />setbacks. The townhomes in Stonebay have a variety of side yard setbacks, with the smallest at <br />14 feet. <br />The plans show a minimum distance of 11.5 feet between the sides of buildings. Where building <br />face each other, 30 feet is proposed. The distance between the house pad and the edge of the <br />private street is 20 feet, which will allow parking without encroaching into the street. This <br />configuration is similar to the Stonebay townhomes, though those driveways can be as short as <br />18 feet. <br /> <br />Provided for reference in Exhibit F is a snapshot of a portion Stonebay with townhomes, <br />illustrating the setbacks. <br /> <br />Parking. The proposal includes 9 spots in 4 areas for visitor parking. This is in addition to the <br />garage parking and the driveway parking for each unit. There is no code requirement for visitor <br />parking. Given the width of the private road, there will be no parking on the road. <br /> <br />Building design. Building design details are still being developed, but the developer has provided <br />general schematics for discussion, attached as Exhibit C. Staff has advised the applicant that the <br />buildings should convey the same ‘character’ as those in Stonebay: colors, materials, roof pitch, <br />etc. <br /> <br />Landscaping. A landscaping plan has not been completed, which is standard for a project at this <br />stage. The RPUD standards go into detail regarding the minimum requirements. No deviation is <br />expected. The plans do include a wrought iron look fence along the East/ west/ and south <br />property lines. Staff envisions a development incorporate berming and landscaping to establish <br />an edge to the street/ public areas and the private neighborhood. <br /> <br />Utilities. All utility plans, including stormwater management, water, and sanitary sewer will need <br />to be approved by the City Engineer and/ or watershed district. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. The Commission should comment on the following: <br />a. Proposed reduction in density <br />b. External setbacks <br />c. Internal setbacks
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.