My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 08/19/2020 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 08/30/2020 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 10/29/2020 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members <br /> Dustin Rief, City Administrator <br /> <br />From: Laura Oakden <br /> Planner <br /> <br />Date: September 21, 2020 <br /> <br />Subject: LA20-000057, Michael Gallus Construction Inc, 1985 Fagerness Point Road, <br />Variance, Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />The applicant is looking to convert to existing garage into more living space for the home. They <br />are proposing to construct a new garage addition to the home with porch above. The new <br />addition will be within the street yard and the average lakeshore setback. The applicant is also <br />widening the driveway to accommodate the new garage and requesting new hardcover within <br />the 75’ lakeyard setback for the new driveway space. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis (For Variance Applications Only) <br />Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified that there are other properties in <br />the neighborhood with very close garages to the road as a practical difficulty supporting the <br />requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding <br />Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony <br />regarding the application. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the project <br />does not meet practical difficulty standards. The owner currently has reasonable use for the <br />property with an existing single family home built in 2009. The addition would be out of <br />convenience. <br /> <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Section 78-350 - Building Setbacks: <br />DISTRICT LR-1C Required Existing Proposed <br />Street 30’ 38’ 14’ <br />Side (South) 7.5’ 15.8’ No Building Change <br />Side (North) 7.5’ 11’ No Building Change <br />Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for average lakeshore setback, <br />street yard setback, distance between a garage door and property line and a wider driveway <br />than is permitted within the 75’ lakeyard. Variances would allow for an addition and a new <br />driveway. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. The applicant has not <br />met standards for practical difficulty.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.