My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 21, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden replied when the application was first submitted, this line (noted onscreen), was not shown <br />on the Survey and is something Staff required as part of the review. Once applied, Staff identified that <br />the average lakeshore setback variance would be required and was published as such. If the Applicant <br />wishes to meet the setback, the entire corner would need to be removed or behind the line. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler asked if that is inclusive of stairs. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden responded yes, inclusive of stairs as they’d only allow up to 42 inches to encroach, so if the <br />stairs rise over 42 inches above existing grade, it is seen as an encroachment. She showed onscreen that <br />the stairs rise relatively steeply, so the homeowner would have to provide elevations and show that they <br />meet the average lakeshore setback in any amended plans they may wish to submit. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler asked how the stairs are currently. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden showed a current elevation onscreen, noting a relatively flat driveway and that the stairs go <br />up in a curved fashion, noting she doesn’t have elevation measurements on the stairs, but they would <br />measure from existing grade per the survey. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler said it looks like the current sidewalk and steps are encroaching slightly on the average <br />lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden responded, potentially, if they rise 42 inches above existing grade. She said they’re allowed <br />to have things within the average lakeshore setback if they’re low to the ground (under 42 inches). <br />However anything above 42 inches over existing grade triggers the need for a variance and is seen as an <br />encroachment. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler said that’s interesting, whether hardcover or not. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden said they’re allowed to put hardcover in the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />Gettman asked if there are any pictures of 1973 Fagerness Point Road, the home they’re trying to mirror. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden pulled the picture up onscreen and noted it had approved variances in 2019, and they <br />reconstructed an existing garage, changed the shape of it slightly, and she believes they moved it back off <br />the street farther and made it slightly wider to make it more conforming and improved some of the <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />Gettman asked if there are any other similar lots, where regardless of the improvement they are still <br />encroaching on the setback. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden replied most of the lots along Fagerness have encroachments, and some received variances, <br />but are all variances based on existing conditions or existing structures. She clarified they are not creating <br />new encroachments but amending existing buildings. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler noted the term they refer to often is building like-kind and improving positions, and that <br />jumps out at him on this.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.