My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
states this to be true. Staff would recommend the Planning Commission to discuss the parking <br />limitations for the property by shrinking the current driveway and parking availability. <br /> <br />Response: Our plan accommodates covered parking of two vehicle and 5 vehicles in driveway <br />and parking spot. We can accommodate more than any neighbor. <br /> <br /> <br />1987 Fagerness: Driveway & Garage Only <br />1981 Fagerness: Garage, 3 cars driveway 2 cars parking spot <br />1975 Fagerness: Garage, 2 cars parking spot <br />1971 Fagerness: Garage, 2 cars driveway and 2 cars parking spot <br />1973 Fagerness: Garage, 2 cars driveway and 2 cars parking spot <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The property owner built the principle <br />building to meet all setbacks in 2009. The addition to the home is not necessary to alleviate a <br />practical difficulty and would merely serve as a convenience to the Owner. <br /> <br />Response: Does not accommodate our requirement to care for my disabled Father in Law. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend, or Council may impose conditions in granting of <br />variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough <br />proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed <br />beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Other Factors: <br /> <br />We plan to remove an existing structurally engineered retaining wall and steps to our front door <br />that have settled over the years and caused water issues and settling. The new retaining wall and <br />steps would be part of a frost depth foundation to eliminate any future settling. Pictures of the <br />existing steps and retaining wall are attached. <br /> <br />In summary, we have practical difficulty. We are building this addition, over our existing <br />driveway. We are under our allowable hardscape. All neighbors have been granted variances as <br />evidenced in the proposal. Not granting similar variances for our property will put us at an <br />disadvantage to property values of our neighbors. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.