My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:34:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEM <br /> <br />Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: DJR <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1. Purpose. The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance. <br /> <br />2. Background. The property has a home and an existing accessory structure on a substandard lot. <br />The accessory structure is currently placed 2’ from the side property line where 7.5’ is required. The <br />applicant is proposing to add a loft to the building and raise the roof line which will increase the massing <br />of the building in the setback area. The applicant has submitted additional documents outlining the plans <br />to manage any drainage for the site, Exhibit C. <br /> <br />3. 15.99 Deadline. The applicant made a complete application on 8/18/2020. Following the 60-day rule <br />the review period expires on 10/17/2020. <br /> <br />4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed <br />application and held a public hearing on September 21, 2020. The Commission noted that the applicant is <br />using the same footprint and saving some of the existing building. The Commission noted concerns <br />regarding the proposed steep roof pitch and draining on the property with the small existing (2-foot) setback. <br />The Commission voted 3-2 (Ressler and Gettman) to deny the variance request. <br /> <br />5. Public Comment. The neighbor to the south submitted a letter of support for the project. The neighbor <br />to the north has submitted some comments regarding the application. They have concerns regarding <br />drainage and suggested gutters be placed on the buildings. The email is included as Exhibit G. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation. Planning Staff find the practical difficulties are not met and recommends denial. <br /> <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />The Council should review the application and determine if the practical difficulties are met for the <br />variance required. Council should direct staff to draft a resolution. <br /> <br />Exhibits <br />A. Proposed Survey <br />B. Proposed Plans <br />C. Proposed Hardcover <br />D. Update Drainage plans <br />E. Neighbor Comments <br />F. Narrative <br />G. PC Minutes <br />H. PC Staff Report <br /> <br />References <br />PC Exhibits <br />A. Application and Narrative <br />B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />C. Existing & Proposed Survey <br />D. Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />F. Engineer Comments <br />Item No.: 15 Date: October 12, 2020 <br />Item Description: LA20-000056 – Kuhl Design Build, 3249 Casco Circle, Variance <br />Presenter: Laura Oakden <br />Planner <br />Agenda <br />Section: <br />Planning Department <br />Report
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.