My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
09-28-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:34:00 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:30:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 19 of 26 <br /> <br />they will need to clear cut a larger area to accommodate that grading issue. He thinks this is the reason <br />the 18% limitation is there and why dry buildable is so important. <br /> <br />Johnson asked what Barnhart’s concern is with utilizing 22.5. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied he doesn’t have any information to suggest that it is too much or too little, he hasn’t done <br />the analysis. He thinks 18% is where they should go. <br /> <br />Johnson noted to do a walk out basement, it’s typical to have 22.5% grade. <br /> <br />Barnhart said he doesn’t know if it’s typical, it can happen, and he doesn’t know what typical is. <br /> <br />Johnson said perhaps it’s reasonable. <br /> <br />Barnhart clarified he doesn’t believe he has any information to suggest that they depart from 18%. <br /> <br />Crosby said not to waver from Barnhart’s point, but if there isn’t an argument to not look at it or look into <br />it, or the difference, why wouldn’t they. <br /> <br />Barnhart said other than one developer or surveyor saying he has an issue in this one isolated situation, he <br />needs more to just open up the entire code and dig into every single standard. <br /> <br />Johnson asked of the five surveyors Barnhart sent it to, how many responses he received from the <br />surveyors. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied he got one response. <br /> <br />Johnson noted it’s 100% of their response. He noted the response said a typical walkout house drops 9 <br />feet in 40 feet, which is 22.5% slope. Johnson said if you think about a walkout and that is 22.5% slope, <br />it seems reasonable to him to count up to 22.5% and asked what they are guarding against by using the <br />potentially arbitrary number of 18%. <br /> <br />Barnhart responded the 18% has been there since before they started and he’s unsure what started it. He <br />said to keep in mind they don’t do dry buildable calculations at the time of building permit, and they’ve <br />never used the calculation at a walkout basement. <br /> <br />Johnson said when someone is under the zoning side, if they purchase a vacant lot, the City would <br />exclude any slopes or bluffs over 18% in the calculation dry buildable for how much hardcover they can <br />have, as an example. <br /> <br />Barnhart said he’s doesn’t know if hardcover excludes dry buildable, but the City would in theory use the <br />dry buildable calculation to determine the lot size when looking at the dry lot area variance, for example. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if people have the opportunity to grade the area if it was 22% to bring it to 18% to get more <br />dry buildable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.