My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
09-14-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:35:52 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:23:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
342
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, August 17, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 1 of 6 <br /> <br />3. LA20-000030 and LA20-000050 ERIC LUTH O/B/O YMCA OF METRO MINNEAPOLIS <br />AND GORDON JAMES INC., 135 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, 7:31 P.M. – 8:07 P.M. <br /> <br />John Quinlivan of Gordon James Inc., Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart closed the presentation by saying A) Planning <br />Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as proposed. B.) Planning Staff <br />recommends approval of the subdivision as proposed, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the MUSA expansion <br />2. Met Council approval of the connection point and permit for the sanitary sewer system. <br />3. MCWD approval of the stormwater management plan. <br />4. Council support from the strict reading of lot width standards for Lots 1 and 2. <br />5. City Engineer comments. <br />6. Planning staff comments. <br />7. Provision of a landscape plan. <br /> <br />Ressler asked if Barnhart could cover the explanation of the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) and <br />how that affects the City’s density, since that is part of the 10-year Comprehensive Plan, he’d like to <br />understand the effects of that one more time. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted in the packet there is a worksheet (Table 3B-4) which had been put together with the <br />Comprehensive Plan to show the results if nothing happened (Line 1), or if they pursued the action (Line <br />2). He said with the current Comprehensive Plan, the calculated City density (the density of all the <br />properties throughout the community that are served by the MUSA) served by sanitary sewer is 4.684. <br />That is important to note as there is property along the lakes that is guided for low density 2 acre lots and <br />they do not want to add more density adjacent to the lake, so they created a capacity in a more recent <br />Comprehensive Plan to allow connection of those larger lots to the City’s septic system without having to <br />add another 50 story apartment building somewhere in town. Barnhart said the Council worked very hard <br />on the last Comprehensive Plan to clarify where it is appropriate to put high density and in certain areas <br />that are marginal, where it is not appropriate to put high density, as it has the rural character that is Orono. <br />By adding that capacity there are certain areas, like the one before the Commission, which is a 13-acre <br />parcel that can support 5 lots; If the City wants to serve that with sanitary sewer, they can do it without <br />too big of a hit or having to add for density elsewhere. He said the Commission may recall a subdivision <br />at 690 Brown Road a couple of years ago, which had 7 lots on 24 acres, again a large lot adjacent to Long <br />Lake which is an impaired water, and allows them to provide sewer to that area without detriment to other <br />areas in the community. Getting back to the chart, Barnhart noted the minimum density must be 3 units <br />an acre or more (part of the Met Council rules) and Orono is at 4.685. With this change, by adding 13 <br />acres, the total amount of acres in MUSA is 227.2 and based on the density guidance of all of that <br />property, they are proposing 1,008 units and the density is 4.437. He said it is above the 3 unit minimum <br />density, noting it’s a bit of a reduction from what they have now but not a huge change. As for the other <br />columns in Table 3B-4, Barnhart noted the Met Council requires each City to identify opportunities for <br />growth in two 10-year periods, the 2021-2030 period and the 2031-2040 period. Looking at all of the <br />growth in the MUSA area, they had to identify a potential for this number of homes, noting the next layer <br />is that the density is fine and the City has opportunities for new homes in the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.