Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA20-30 <br />August 17, 2020 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />(6) Preservation or reinterpretation of local landmarks. The plan identifies the Luce Line <br />bridge as the dominate landmark in the area is the Luce Line Bridge, beyond the <br />boundaries of the project. <br /> <br />Lot Analysis Worksheet <br />This project is developed to be compatible with the RR-1B zoning district. If sewered, the district <br />requires 2 acres of gross lot area, and 0.5 acres of dry buildable land. This district requires 200 <br />feet of lot width. <br /> <br /> <br />Gross <br />area <br />Buildable <br />Area (acres) Width (feet) Notes <br />Lot 1 2.19 2.07 21* <br />Lot 2 8.17 2.3 130** Cul de sac lot <br />Lot 3 3.53 2.53 200+ Lot abutting tributary <br />Lot 4 7.84 2.0 200+ Lot abutting tributary <br />Lot 5 16.72 2.0 200+*** Lot abutting tributary <br /> <br />The area calculations are assumed, based on the sketch plan configuration, final numbers have <br />been requested. <br /> <br />Staff has the following comments regarding the subdivision design/ configuration. <br /> <br />*Lot width, Lot 1. Lot 1 is a corner lot. The front lot line is the one on Orono Orchard Road, <br />which does not provide adequate width at the building setback. However, the lot width on the <br />new road is more than adequate to provide the necessary lot width for the expected home <br />character. There had been some discussion about creating an outlot for an entrance monument, <br />removing the frontage, though that has not been reflected in the plans. <br /> <br />**Lot width, Lot 2. The lot width for a non-lakeshore lot is measured at the “rear of the front <br />yard”. In the RR-1B zoning district, that is 50 feet from the property line. The width for lot 2 is <br />computed as 130 feet, less than the 200 feet required. The Council has been flexible with this <br />requirement for cul de sac lots. <br /> <br />***Buildable area, lot 5. An existing easement runs through the buildable area of lot five, <br />drastically reducing available building sites. Future owners will be constrained by this easement <br />for any improvement, including patios, garages, sheds, etc. It is recommended that this easement <br />be vacated and relocated. <br />The City Council may grant variances from the subdivision code so that substantial justice may <br />be done and the public interest secured, provided that such a variance shall not have the effect <br />of nullifying the intent and purpose of this chapter. <br /> <br />Development Sign. The applicants have indicated a desire to place a monument sign at the <br />entrance, though not shown. There is a 100 foot setback from the tributary for buildings/ <br />structures, effectively forcing the sign to be located on the south side of the road. An easement <br />and maintenance document will need to be prepared for a sign on private property. <br /> <br />The project includes the development of a new private road extending into the property from <br />Orono Orchard Road. This road appears to meet city standards for length, ROW width, and <br />pavement width. A homeowners association or maintenance document will be required to