Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM <br />Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: Approved By: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1. Purpose. To consider a sketch plan proposal for a 4 lot single family residential subdivision. <br /> <br />2. Background. The applicant proposes to subdivide two existing parcels into 4 lots. Two of the <br />lots would be substandard by virtue of lot area, and two lots would be conforming. <br /> <br />Lot Analysis Area Required Width Required Conforming? Notes <br />West Side (2474 Carman <br />Street) <br /> <br /> <br />North of Inlet (LR- <br />1C-1) <br />0.93 .5 acre 136' 100' Yes Width is measured only <br />at lake, wetlands may <br />reduce lot area <br /> <br />South of Inlet (LR- <br />1B) <br />0.66 1 acre 124' 140' No, Lot area <br />and width <br />Width is measured only <br />at lake <br />East Side (2480 Carman <br />Street) <br /> <br /> <br />North of Inlet (LR- <br />1C-1) <br />1.02 .5 acre 121' 100' Yes Width is measured only <br />at lake <br /> <br />South of Inlet (LR- <br />1B) <br />0.64 1 acre 155' 140' No, Lot area Width is measured only <br />at lake <br /> <br />The two proposed lots south of the inlet are currently developed with single family homes. The <br />two proposed lots north of the inlet are undeveloped. Access to these lots would likely come via <br />a shared driveway off of Shoreline Drive. One of the lots contains a wetland, reducing the lot <br />area once verified. The attached Planning Commission staff report provides further detail on the <br />proposal. <br /> <br />The primary question for the Council regards their appetite for waiving the minimum standards <br />for the lots south of the inlet. Due to the land characteristics, the lots south of the inlet could not <br />be conforming unless they were combined. A secondary question is the two proposed lots south <br />of the inlet share a private driveway with a 3rd lot off of Carman, the city ordinances allow two <br />properties to share a driveway. This proposal does not increase nor improve this non-conformity. <br /> <br />3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On February 18th, the Planning Commission <br />reviewed the project, and provided feedback. The Planning Commission noted the challenges <br />with creating conforming lots [due to the amount of land available], but did not support a waiver <br />of the lot area requirements. <br /> <br />4. Public Comment. To date, no comments have been received in support or opposition to the <br />request. <br /> <br />5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the City Council provide feedback. <br /> <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Staff requests feedback. No formal action is requested. <br /> <br />Item No.: Date: March 9, 2020 <br />Item Description: #LA20-09, Don Gamble o/b/o Richard A and Kim A Edwards, 2480 <br />and 2474 Carman Street, Sketch Plan <br />Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP <br />Community Development Director <br />Agenda <br />Section: <br />Planning Department <br />report