My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
08-13-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:26:53 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:21:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, June 15, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 12 of 12 <br /> <br />Bollis stated he does not believe the Planning Commission should be adding additional code that is going <br />to create variances if it is not an issue today. He does not see that it has become an issue. He has not seen <br />a variance request for it. <br /> <br />Barnhart said Staff has been able to suggest that they do not apply for one and fix the issue. Staff would <br />be helped with having standards in place in those discussions. <br /> <br />Bollis stated he feels that anytime a number is put on something, someone is going to come in and ask for <br />something different, such as 25% hardcover and someone coming in to ask for 26%. It says 18 feet; they <br />are going to come in and ask for 17 feet, 16 feet, etc. He said an issue is being created by adding it in. He <br />does not see the issue of “snow piling” on current subdivisions and is not in favor of it. <br /> <br />Gettman stated he supports the 18 feet. <br /> <br />Ressler noted, as Barnhart mentioned, the text amendments regarding subdivision is not urgent and could <br />be tabled. He does not think it would be unreasonable, and noted that is what the deliberation is currently. <br /> <br />Kirchner commented that Barnhart asked for the Commissioners’ opinion on minor subdivisions and lot <br />splits. He said he agrees with Barnhart that the Commission should not allow for those to happen without <br />this process and protocol, especially if the vast majority of what Staff is seeing would fall into that <br />criteria. He thinks it is prudent to keep that in place. <br /> <br />Bollis moved, Kirchner seconded, to table LA19-000065 City of Orono, Text Amendment: <br />Subdivisions. Roll Call Vote: Ayes 3 (Erickson, Bollis, Kirchner), Nays 3 (Libby, Gettman, Ressler). <br />Motion failed. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated Staff is not opposed to bringing this back with some of the changes made. It is an <br />important document in the development of the community, and he does not want to rush it. He does not <br />have an Applicant coming in and ready to apply this. He will incorporate the changes that he can <br />incorporate and call out the areas he cannot; the Commission can review it again at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Ressler asked if it was an option to leave it as-is and not make a motion. <br /> <br />Staff would recommend it be tabled and to come back in July. <br /> <br />Ressler stated, based on the feedback, the motion should be re-entertained. <br /> <br />Bollis moved, Kirchner seconded, to table LA19-000065 City of Orono, Text Amendment: <br />Subdivisions. Roll Call Vote: Ayes 6 (Libby, Erickson, Bollis, Kirchner, Gettman, Ressler), Nays 0. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.