Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 26, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />his 13 years of dedicated service to the City as a Police Officer as follows: “Whereas, Jason Barnes was <br />appointed to the position of Community Service Officer in August 2007; and Whereas, Jason Barnes <br />hired as a Part-Time Police Officer on February 26, 2013 and; Whereas, Jason Barnes was promoted to <br />Full-Time Police Officer on May 14, 2013 and; Whereas, Jason Barnes was assigned as the Orono School <br />District Liaison Officer and Investigator 2018 through May 2020 and provided valuable experience and <br />played a significant role in the prosecution of many criminal cases and; Whereas, his years of service as <br />Police Officer has been characterized by his dedication to providing the highest quality police service to <br />the City and its citizens and; Whereas, Jason Barnes has provided service to the community in a fair, <br />respectful, honest, trustworthy, and selfless manner and; Whereas, Jason Barnes is resigning from his <br />position as Police Officer effective May 29, 2020. Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Orono City <br />Council does hereby recognize and commend Officer Jason Barnes for his leadership and dedicated <br />service to the community as Police Officer. Be it further resolved that the Orono City Council does <br />hereby extend its best wishes to Office Jason Barnes. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota <br />at a regular meeting held this 26th day of May, 2020.” <br /> <br />Seals moved, Printup seconded, to approve the resignation of Jason Barnes effective May 29, 2020, <br />and approve Resolution No. 7099 for 13 years of dedicated service to the City of Orono. VOTE: <br />Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />9. WOODHILL AVENUE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />Edwards noted Item No. 9 was tabled at the last Council meeting for additional information. The <br />Community Service Director spent countless hours putting together the packet looking into the history of <br />the Woodhill access issue. The Council action is focused on the temporary speed humps the City has been <br />installing/uninstalling every year since about 2013. The City was requested to no longer put the speed <br />humps in from residents who live at the end of the road and have to traverse the speed humps. Also, from <br />the City Engineer’s perspective, speed humps are not an effective means to control speed, particularly on <br />a street such as Woodhill, and the installation/removal/maintenance costs $900-$1,000 yearly. Staff <br />recommends removal of the speed humps. Since it is an emotional issue, Staff brought it to the City <br />Council for a decision. <br /> <br />Walsh said he did not think it was as much of an emotional issue as a community/neighborhood <br />expectation from a lawsuit many years ago, and the resolution to have the access were the speed humps to <br />slow traffic down. He noted he was at Janie Delaney’s residence and saw a number of large and small <br />vehicles slow down for the speed humps. The biggest thing that bothered him is when he did MapQuest <br />coming from Golden Valley, it told him the quickest and most direct route was to go through Woodhill <br />Avenue through the golf course and go against the one-way road. He stated people are not supposed to <br />come from the other way and they are obviously doing so all the time. He was at Ms. Delaney’s back door <br />and there are people coming through there, especially on Friday and Saturday nights when there are lots <br />of activities going on, and it is a parade of lights going past her house, etc. He said the speed humps were <br />a condition of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Whether they lived up to it by putting them in and they <br />somehow disappeared, he still thinks the nature of the expectation was that they were going to stay. Until <br />the neighborhood completely says they do not need the speed humps and it should be changed to a two- <br />lane road, it should probably stay the way it is because that is what was agreed to. He thinks speed humps <br />slow things down, commenting that there was a similar issue on Crystal Bay Road because that was the <br />shortcut going to Lafayette. Residents were very happy to see the speed humps put in at that location. <br />Since MapQuest took him down a one-way road the wrong way, he also suggested somebody call