Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,November 9,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Walsh said,however,they do not know that. <br /> Mr. Storlien said they have had the discussion and it was their decision to submit it this way to see what <br /> shakes out. <br /> Walsh asked how relevant is it that the Applicant cannot make the pond bigger...is it the end of the world <br /> that the line must be where it is and asked the impact of that. <br /> Curtis replied the 15 foot buffer is a requirement for the flood plain regulations and the City has varied it <br /> in the past,particularly on Baldur Park where it is impossible to reach that bench when elevating the <br /> home. It has been a variance the City has granted in the past. This lot is just wider than those properties; <br /> it is a very low area and is impacted by the flood plain. <br /> Walsh said he could see that as a general practical difficulty. <br /> Johnson said it seems like the Applicant should know that about the pond before asking. <br /> Walsh does not know how they solve the problem to the left and right of the house. <br /> Mr. Storlien said potentially, if the ponds can get wider, they can get shorter. The issue they run into is <br /> grading from the elevation of the pond level up to the driveway becomes steeper which then causes <br /> problems for lawn maintenance. <br /> Walsh said the best thing to do may be to table this,go find the answer, and see what the palatability of <br /> doing that is. <br /> Curtis said it makes sense,and there is another jurisdiction involved with the modification to the plan and <br /> running it through their process again. She noted it is a Staff process, so it can be done quickly,but she <br /> thinks it is reasonable. <br /> Motion by Johnson,seconded by Seals,to table LA20-000022—Randy Haapala,HNH Homes o/b/o <br /> William & Kathleen Wanner, 1095 Ferndale Rd West,Variances and CUPs.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays <br /> 0. <br /> 21. DISCUSSION RELATED TO A POTENTIAL TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO <br /> RESIDENTIAL DOCK USE AND CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS <br /> Barnhart said in the course of enforcing the dock regulations as they do by complaint, Staff has learned <br /> that in this particular instance, non-resident users lived in the neighborhood nearby and were using the <br /> dock for the subject property. These residents contacted the Mayor, who seemed to recall some history <br /> with an exception discussion. Staff looked in to the history and in 2011-2012,the City Council looked at <br /> the regulations as they applied to dock usage and ultimately they landed on current code/regulation. Does <br /> the Council want to entertain the change to the code and if so, is there anything particular they would like <br /> to see and then can come back and go through the process to make those changes. <br /> Walsh said the discussion is not unknown people coming and renting docks, as the City does not allow <br /> that;the issue now is a neighbor complaining about another neighbor, as someone across the street who is <br /> friends with someone on the water and has allowed them to put their boat there, or maybe more than one. <br /> The Council is dealing with neighbors complaining about neighbors trying to do neighborly things for <br /> Page 7 of 15 <br />