My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
10-23-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 2:48:31 PM
Creation date
7/15/2015 2:32:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 9, 2006 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />(7. #06-3231 WILLIAM S. DAMPIER, 3550 IVY PLACE, Continued) <br /> <br />Dampier stated the cantilevered portion extends 23 inches out past the foundation and that the 480 square <br />feet of deck that he would like to trade for the bow portion of the structure would be an improvement to <br />the structure. Dampier stated he was told that he could not construct a two-story residence by then <br />Planner Wendy Bottenberg. Dampier stated that downstairs is the great room, the master bedroom and a <br />bathroom. There is no second floor above the great room so that leaves one bedroom, a bathroom and a <br />long narrow room intended to be the sewing room upstairs. But his [older]daughter will be moving in <br />with her husband when they finish college soon and his [younger] daughter is expecting a child, so he <br />needs a third bedroom. The reason for the addition is that the sewing room is too small. <br /> <br />Dampier stated the houses on either side of his house have setbacks that extend into his side setbacks and <br />that the only portion of this structure that would extend into the side setback would be the 23-inch <br />cantilever that is already in place. If the variance is granted, his [younger] daughter would get a bedroom <br />and he would be able to finish the house. Dampier pointed out the neighbors’ view of the lake would not <br />be diminished in any way. Dampier requested the City trade the 480 square feet of deck for the 170 <br />square feet of structure. <br /> <br />Peterson inquired whether a copy of the 2000 resolution that was approved is available. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in 2000 the variances that were granted allowed an addition to the street side of the home, <br />which also dealt with some drainage issues and provided an entryway. The addition brought the house up <br />to 15 percent structural coverage and the Council discussed in great length the deck. Gaffron stated the <br />deck as originally constructed would have been considered structural coverage and that some terracing of <br />the deck was then proposed to avoid the deck being considered structural coverage. <br /> <br />Sansevere inquired whether the history given by the applicant was correct. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated all discussions with the applicant were accompanied with the statement that the Planning <br />Commission and City Council would need to approve the application and not just Staff. <br /> <br />Dampier stated he does not remember that Gaffron ever informed him that the City Council would for <br />sure approve his application but that Gaffron would recommend approval of the project to the Council. <br /> <br />Sansevere noted in 2005 the applicant was issued a permit to remodel the second story, with the plans <br />also including a cantilever and a semi-circular room extending from the second story toward the lake. <br />The building official at that time clearly indicated that those plans were not approved. <br /> <br />Dampier stated he submitted the plans in March and in April the building inspector had informed him that <br />he had verbal permission to go ahead with the plans that had been submitted. He was informed <br />approximately one month later that he did not have permission to proceed but the cantilever was already <br />constructed. <br /> <br />Sansevere inquired whether Gaffron has any recollection of the previous application. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the application was received April 29, 2005 and the plans were approved in July. Gaffron <br />stated he is not aware why there was a delay in approving the plans but that this project has been ongoing <br />since 2000. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />PAGE 5 of 10 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda 10-23-06 <br />Approval of Minutes 10-09-06 [Page 5 of 10]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.