Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 25, 2006 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />(15. POLICE SERVICE CONTRACT, Continued) <br /> <br />understandable and improve the lines of communication. White stated the offer was a showing of good <br />will on the part of Orono. <br /> <br />Sansevere commented in his opinion there has always been good will on the part of Orono. <br /> <br />Murphy stated his understanding of the work session is that there was a recommendation that the proposal <br />be made to the City of Long Lake and they could either accept it or reject it. <br /> <br />Gilbert stated he is not able to commit on behalf of the City of Long Lake, but that Long Lake does <br />believe in the safety of the community. The Long Lake City Council reviewed a number of documents <br />prior to reaching their decision to reduce the level of service and that in his opinion the contract should be <br />rewritten. <br /> <br />Gilbert stated the Long Lake City Council was informed at the time a tavern was added to their city limits <br />that they would need to add a police officer, and that at the present time they have seen the loss of two <br />bars within the city limits, which has played a factor in their decision to reduce the level of protection. <br /> <br />Gilbert stated he appreciates the good will offer and understands that the police department and others <br />feel Long Lake should maintain that level of service but that the City Council made their decision based <br />on the information that they had available to them. Gilbert stated their decision was not budget driven, <br />and that if the City of Long Lake felt that level of service was needed, they would have continued it. <br /> <br />McMillan suggested the City of Long Lake be given a full explanation on the level of service that the <br />Orono Police Department provides to Long Lake on a routine basis, which may not necessarily be <br />reflected as statistics on a piece of paper. McMillan stated she is hopeful that the City of Long Lake <br />would be willing to engage in some dialogue on this situation. <br /> <br />Gilbert concurred that information is critical in arriving at a decision and that with a good will offer he <br />would like to see some set of criteria established for the discussions. Gilbert requested the City of Long <br />Lake be provided whatever information the City of Orono feels would be helpful to make a decision. <br /> <br />Sansevere stated he had the misunderstanding that the City of Long Lake would pick up the second half. <br /> <br />Murphy stated in his view there is an obligation on the part of Long Lake to provide adequate police <br />protection to their citizens. Murphy stated the contract should be rewritten, noting that the contract <br />reflects that the City of Orono is receiving only basic service, which is not the situation at all. Murphy <br />stated the good will offer gives both cities time to clarify the contract and the services being provided. <br /> <br />Sansevere stated it still comes down to the fact that the City of Orono is giving the City of Long Lake free <br />police protection for six months. Sansevere questioned why the contract was signed in the first place if it <br />is not understandable. <br /> <br />Murphy stated the City of Orono would need some time to rewrite the contract and explain the terms of <br />the contract. <br /> <br />Gilbert stated the lack of information has not been a factor in their opinion and that he is not aware of any <br />issues that the City of Long Lake should be aware of as it relates to police protection. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />PAGE 10 of 14 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda 10/09/06 <br />Approval of Minutes 09/25/06 [Page 10 of 14]