My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2020 4:02:23 PM
Creation date
11/17/2020 4:02:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, October 12,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> the subdivision code; there is some discussion about where the 18% dry-buildable calculation <br /> came from and Staff was directed to look into State statute and other regulations. Barnhart could <br /> not find the source, so he is led to the conclusion that the City can establish whatever they want <br /> in terms of a definition of dry-buildable, so if the Council doesn't want to include the 18%they <br /> can remove it, or they can have a 22.5% slope, although that is a very specific number. He <br /> suggested doing a round number of 30%which is similar to a bluff slope without being a bluff. <br /> Johnson asked what money it saves doing the summary ordinance rather than publishing the full <br /> 39 pages. <br /> Barnhart responded it is several hundred dollars because when they pass an ordinance they are <br /> required to publish it and 39 pages published in the newspaper will be very expensive, probably <br /> close to $1,500. <br /> Johnson noted he is fine with the summary and said he did some research on the subject. He <br /> thinks the engineering grade is a 3:1 ratio, which is not to exceed 33%; if the City wants it rooted <br /> in something, this is the ordinary engineering maximum standard in grading. He said this <br /> excludes defined bluffs and wetlands, so they are talking about dry-buildable for the calculation <br /> and he suggests 33%. <br /> Mayor Walsh said it will potentially add more dry-buildable to sites. <br /> Johnson noted one workaround is if the City keeps it at 22%, they grade that as they do more <br /> earth work to get it "flatter." If the City uses the 3:1 ratio,they can actually preserve some areas <br /> from being re-graded to meet the standard. <br /> Mayor Walsh asked what the downside is. <br /> Barnhart replied they may see some areas that would have been excluded before will now be <br /> included in the minimum. He remembers early in the development of the YMCA project at 135 <br /> Orono Road,the dry-buildable calculation was very critical because in creating a non-sewered <br /> lot, the dry-buildable area needs to be contiguous. Therefore that 18%was critical in how the lot <br /> lines were created. He noted they frankly don't have a huge number of vacant lots it would <br /> apply to, so that is the downside and he doesn't know how big of a ramification that will be in <br /> the long-term. He clarified the downside is in areas where previously they could fit 5 lots, they <br /> may be able to fit 7 lots. <br /> Mayor Walsh said that is not a downside to him. <br /> Johnson noted the 18% is a 20-year-old rule that was an old septic requirement. <br /> Johnson moved, Crosby seconded,to give Staff permission to publish the summary ordinance. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to use the 3:1 or 33% ratio for dry-buildable. VOTE: Ayes 4, <br /> Nays 0. <br /> Page 17 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.