My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2020 4:02:23 PM
Creation date
11/17/2020 4:02:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, October 12, 2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Crosby moved, Seals seconded,to approve LA20-000060—City of Orono Text Amendment <br /> Related to Amendments to Variances as drafted. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 19. LA20-000047—CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO BOAT <br /> STORAGE <br /> Barnhart said when he first started in Orono, the direction he received from the City Council was <br /> there are quite a bit of rules and regulations and occasionally it will be necessary to review those, <br /> re-open the book and take a look at it. He noted this is a good example; regulations are in place <br /> that guide the storage of boats on residential property and noted he included a copy of the section <br /> in the Code in the packet and it is a mess. There is an opportunity to re-examine what the goals <br /> are as a Council and then Staff and the City Attorney can draft an ordinance that meets those <br /> goals. Barnhart is looking for feedback from the Council on the 16 questions onscreen/in the <br /> packet. He noted they can schedule the discussion for an upcoming work session and asked the <br /> Council to look at the questions and start putting their questions and feedback together. <br /> Mr. Richie Anderson said this was done not that many years ago and the previous ordinance was <br /> for storage of a 23 foot boat and one of the former Councilmembers wanted to store a bigger boat <br /> in his yard, so he came and made it a 30 foot boat. Mr. Anderson said a bunch of the things <br /> listed on screen are irrelevant; he knows what the rules are because he sat here when the Council <br /> went through it talking about 30 foot boats in people's yards, he thought it was kind of ridiculous <br /> at that time. He said the City can't even enforce what they have right now, noting there are <br /> many boats that are over 30 feet being stored right now. He again said this was just done and he <br /> questions why it came up again at this time. <br /> Mayor Walsh stated the reason it came up is because the City had a court case that said what <br /> they have is not enforceable, so the prosecuting attorney said the City needs to fix their code <br /> because it is inconsistent and unenforceable. <br /> Mr. Anderson said one other part is that a property owner had an old wooden boat with a blue <br /> tarp on it for approximately 10 years, then this rule went in to place that people cannot have a <br /> derelict boat in their yard for 2 years. He noted some of the terminology was directly related to <br /> that homeowner and he subsequently moved his boat. <br /> Mayor Walsh said this is really trying to solve those issues and suggested a work session where <br /> the Council can really talk through it. <br /> Mr. Anderson asked if the City lost the court case. <br /> Mayor Walsh replied in the affirmative. <br /> City Attorney Mattick said when Barnhart started working on this and asked for some help, one <br /> of the questions Mr. Mattick always asks instead of mandating something: is what they were <br /> Page 15 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.