My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
10-12-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2020 4:02:23 PM
Creation date
11/17/2020 4:02:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, October 12, 2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> where the density range is 10-20 units/acre, for density or growth calculations, the Met Council <br /> looks at the lowest number of 10 units/acre. Barnhart noted in this situation, it is guided for 20 <br /> units and they are looking to reduce the density and must find a range that would fit. If they <br /> chose the 10-20 units/acre, Met Council would use the 10 units/acre and need to do some <br /> adjustments on the growth projections, and they are 2 units away from getting to that 10 <br /> units/acre. If the Council would allow 37 units on this property, they would not need to make <br /> any adjustments to add more areas for high density, nor would they have to increase higher <br /> density elsewhere. He said that is most likely the easiest way to avoid extending density in areas <br /> where they do not want to have density. <br /> Mayor Walsh noted Stone Bay is 6 units/acres and asked if that is correct. <br /> Barnhart said looking at Stone Bay in the twin-homes and townhomes area, yes it is about 6 <br /> units/acre. <br /> Mayor Walsh said the answer to the question, then, is no the Council cannot drop it down to <br /> what they want without having to go expand other areas. <br /> Barnhart noted if the Council wanted it down to 6 units/acre, the range is 3-10 units/acre so they <br /> will calculate 3 units/acre, and will have to find some more acres to increase density or add <br /> Metropolitan Urban Service Areas (MUSA) to other areas. <br /> Johnson said the guidance is between 3 and 10, and they use the lowest end of the guidance, so if <br /> the development works out to be a 10 units/acre and it is completed, he asked how that affects <br /> the whole matrix. <br /> Barnhart said the Met Council doesn't go back and calculate how it actually developed, for <br /> example, 690 Brown Road project in the MUSA, guided for the lowest density (lower than <br /> prescribed), the prescribed was 13 but the actual development was 7 units. He again noted the <br /> Met Council does not go back and look to see what was actually developed, they look at what it <br /> was guided for. <br /> Johnson said there is a ratio of what is developed and when it is completed it helps the ratio. <br /> Barnhart noted once it is developed, it is no longer opportunity for growth so it is out of the <br /> City's equations. Regarding the areas in Orono's Comprehensive Plan that show potential for <br /> growth and all the acres, he noted those properties have not been developed. <br /> Mayor Walsh asked if the Council guides it from 3-10 units/acre and it ends up being 6 <br /> units/acre when it is built,the City still only gets credit for 3 units/acre. <br /> Barnhart answered yes, and they do not count it the next time the City does an update, it is just <br /> off the books in the sense of opportunities for growth. <br /> Seals said that is goofy. <br /> Page 11 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.