Laserfiche WebLink
�-O�p CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OFTHE CITYCOUNCIL <br /> y� NO. / 1 3 1 <br /> G <br /> ` N. <br /> '/QsHOQ" <br /> 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br /> considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br /> for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br /> defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br /> 78. This condition is not applicable. <br /> 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br /> Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br /> located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residential home is an <br /> allowed conditional use in the LR-1B District. <br /> 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br /> as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br /> 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br /> property or immediately adjoining property. The home currently sits within the setback <br /> and the addition is not going to change the setback from the lake. <br /> 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the <br /> land is located. The proposed addition will not change the current setbacks from the <br /> lake and meets all other zoning setback requirements. The location of the existing <br /> home is unique. <br /> 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br /> substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home can be re-built in kind, <br /> the proposed addition is necessary to permit the property owners continued <br /> enjoyment of their property. The addition is located in a location which serves the <br /> intent and goals of the ordinance by minimizing visual impacts to the lake. <br /> 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or <br /> morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The proposed <br /> project will not impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals of the public. <br /> 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br /> is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Granting of the variance will resolve <br /> and alleviate a demonstrated practical difficulty. <br /> CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: <br /> Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a <br /> variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow an average lakeshore <br /> setback, subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. <br /> 3 <br />