My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2020 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
10-16-2020 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2020 1:46:25 PM
Creation date
11/17/2020 1:46:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> October 19,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gettman asked if there is any history on the pool. <br /> Ms. Curtis replied she does not know the history. <br /> Kirchner clarified there is an existing 14-foot encroachment and this project would be adding an <br /> additional 10 feet totaling 24 feet. <br /> Ms. Curtis responded that is true. She said the setback line angles and is about 14 feet and gets smaller as <br /> one moves to the East; she doesn't know if it is exactly 24 feet but from the house as it sits now it is 10 <br /> feet further towards the lake than the house sits. <br /> Chair Ressler stated it is meaningful to know that the proposed plans are building beyond the lake lot <br /> setback of 75 feet. <br /> Bollis asked Staff to refresh the Commissioners' memory on why the pools on this home and the <br /> neighboring home are not considered within the setback line. <br /> Ms. Curtis reported the average setback line is measured from the most lakeward part of the principal <br /> building. The pools are considered structure so are not part of that calculation. She noted upper level <br /> decks and the home itself would be part of the principal building and that is why the line is drawn from <br /> the location shown,rather than using the pools. <br /> Bollis asked about stairs. <br /> Ms. Curtis said a 6-foot-high portion of the principal building is what Staff uses; she clarified if it is 6 feet <br /> or above. She stated in the average lakeshore setback they allow encroachments that are 42 inches or less. <br /> Libby moved,Kirchner seconded,to approve LA20-000067, 1265 Shoreline Drive,Variance. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> 7. STAFF UPDATE FROM THE OCTOBER 12,2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING(Staff: <br /> Jeremy Barnhart) <br /> Barnhart said many of the items the Planning Commission reviewed in September were reviewed by the <br /> City Council on October 12,2020. The variance at 2697 Casco Point Road was approved;the variance <br /> for 4780 North Arm Drive West was approved. Some items the Planning Commission recommended <br /> denial on,the City Council tabled;the Council had the same struggle with practical difficulties for the <br /> project at 3249 Casco Circle and tabled it pending the Applicant's ability to come back with a revised <br /> plan that would match the practical difficulties. Regarding several variances at 1985 Fagerness Point,the <br /> Applicant made changes to the plan and presented those to the Council;the Council struggled with the <br /> front yard setback so they tabled it. The Council also provided comment on the proposed project at the <br /> Northwest corner of Willow and Wayzata. Their main issue was density and impact on the community <br /> and direction was given;Barnhart noted the Applicant made some drastic changes to the plan so the <br /> Commissioners may want to look at the Council packet from October 12, 2020. The Council approved <br /> the Text Amendment regarding variances and there will be an ordinance that will exclude 33.3%from the <br /> dry-buildable calculation. <br /> Chair Ressler asked regarding 3249 Casco if there was any input from Council on the roofline. <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.