My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-2020 Park Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
2020
>
09-10-2020 Park Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 3:10:28 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 3:10:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> Wednesday, September 10,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Roath said he thought they had discussed that the Dakota Trail might be like the Three Rivers Trail, and <br /> maintaining it in the winter. <br /> Edwards noted Three Rivers does not provide winter maintenance for any of their trails,they very <br /> graciously allow municipalities to maintain their trails in the winter if they so choose. He said recently <br /> they have tried to provide more enticements, for example, Three Rivers will provide the municipalities <br /> $500 per mile of winter trail maintenance,which isn't nearly enough to maintain a mile of trail <br /> throughout the winter, and that has been one of their strategies for their funding shortfall. Edwards noted <br /> he is prejudiced as a public works guy,he personally believes that every government entity ought to take <br /> care of their own stuff, and that the City tax base is there for them to take care of City amenities,the <br /> County tax base is there for County amenities, State,Federal,and so on. However,there is currently <br /> some political will for the City to take that over,and there is a bit of precedent in that historically; Orono <br /> has always maintained the Independence Trail in the winter,primarily because it connects to the City's <br /> trails and functions as a sidewalk for the school. The current guidance from the City Council is to look <br /> into taking care of the Dakota Trail from boundary to boundary and perhaps even offering to Minnetonka <br /> Beach and Spring Park that Orono might maintain their sections as well. <br /> Roath remembered conversations in the past regarding whether they even want them, and there is an <br /> argument that the City shouldn't be clearing the snow off the trails. Nevertheless,all that aside, if they <br /> don't use the Tool Cat for plowing the Dakota Trail,the City would still use the Tool Cat. <br /> Edwards replied they would still use the Tool Cat for their existing sidewalk and trail network,which <br /> they've been trying to do with skid steers, a small tractor and some light pick-up trucks,but they are sub- <br /> optimal for the task. <br /> Edwards continued on in the document and noted the final part of the CIP is Lurton Park,which has its <br /> own fund which was set up when the park came to the City and is now being refreshed with the annual <br /> dog permit fees collected. He said the$4,000 listed for Prairie Maintenance Contract is just for some <br /> visibility,it's an operational maintenance thing that comes out of that fund,and is just to maintain the <br /> existing prairie at the park. He noted a couple years ago they did some trail improvement with gravel <br /> trails and it is proposed in 2021 to do another round of that to the tune of about$20,000 which would <br /> double the amount of improved trail. <br /> Carter asked what the current balance is and how much it goes up per year. <br /> Edwards said Park Passes come in at about$15,000 per year and the projected balance is about$7,000 at <br /> the end of next year(2021),noting they would spend$24,000 and bring in$15,000 and he can't <br /> remember quite what the current balance is right now. <br /> Carter said it sounds like a good idea. <br /> Edwards noted on Exhibit B,the Park Fund is almost exclusively funded from Park Dedication Fees, <br /> which he explained is when a development occurs in the City, an ordinance requires that the developer <br /> either provides a recreational space as part of the development or provides a certain dollar amount(based <br /> on a formula regarding how many lots they're creating)and that is what has traditionally funded the Park <br /> Fund. He said they've had many big projects lately so that fund has gone from the$500,000 range down <br /> to almost$0 now. He stated the City Council has recognized that and wants to dedicate$50,000/year in <br /> levy to that fund. He thinks the Council has aspirations of growing the Park Fund if they can put more of <br /> Page 15 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.